givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-11 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Charitable Impact vs I believe in you

Charitable Impact logo
Charitable Impact
— · 1 countries

Canadian individuals and families who want a single donor-advised Impact Account to organize their giving, support friends' causes, and receive a tax receipt for every contribution they add.

No rating yet
Read full review →
I believe in you logo
I believe in you
DE (AWS Frankfurt) · 1 countries

Austrian athletes, sports clubs, and event organisers raising money for a sporting goal, who are comfortable with an all-or-nothing campaign where funds are released only if the target is met.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Charitable Impact delivers 9.20 more per 100 to the recipient than I believe in you.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Charitable Impact in CAD, I believe in you in EUR.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Charitable Impact I believe in you
Recipient gets (per 100) C$97.20★ winner €88.00
Platform fee 0%★ winner 8%
Payment processing fee 2.8% + C$0.00★ winner 4% + €0.00
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency DE (AWS Frankfurt)
Languages 1 2★ winner
Payment methods supported 5★ winner 2
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Charitable Impact

C$97.20 vs €88.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Charitable Impact if

Canadian individuals and families who want a single donor-advised Impact Account to organize their giving, support friends' causes, and receive a tax receipt for every contribution they add.

  • Operates as a donor-advised fund: donors add money to an Impact Account and recommend gifts to charities over time.
  • A tax receipt is issued for the full amount added to the Impact Account, regardless of when it is granted to charities.
  • Accepts a wide range of assets, including cash, securities, real estate, and cryptocurrency.
  • Peer-to-peer giving, Giving Groups, and campaigns let donors pool and direct money together.
Read full review →
Choose I believe in you if

Austrian athletes, sports clubs, and event organisers raising money for a sporting goal, who are comfortable with an all-or-nothing campaign where funds are released only if the target is met.

  • Focuses exclusively on sport - athletes, clubs, and sports event organisers - rather than general crowdfunding.
  • All-or-nothing model means backers are only charged for campaigns that reach their goal.
  • Operated locally by a Vienna-based entity (I Believe In You Osterreich GmbH) under an established Swiss brand.
  • Austrian site is hosted on Amazon Web Services in Frankfurt, Germany - EU data residency.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Charitable Impact or I believe in you?

Of every 100 donated, Charitable Impact delivers approximately C$97.20 to the recipient and I believe in you delivers approximately €88.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Charitable Impact operates in 1 countries; I believe in you operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →