givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-03 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

OnParticipe vs voordekunst

OnParticipe logo
OnParticipe
France · 1 countries

French and European organisers running cagnottes, ticketed events, or association fundraising who want a no-commission, French-hosted platform with identity controls, and who will read the terms for inactivity and refund charges.

voordekunst logo
voordekunst
EU · 1 countries

Dutch and Flemish artists, creative makers, and cultural institutions running concrete, project-based campaigns who value sector specialization and hands-on crowdfunding coaching.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

On a €100 donation, OnParticipe delivers €8.47 more to the recipient than voordekunst.

OnParticipe & voordekunst don’t process payments in GBP — pricing shown in EUR.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, OnParticipe delivers about €8.47 more of every €100 donated than voordekunst (€100.00 vs €91.53).

voordekunst stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while OnParticipe does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric OnParticipe voordekunst
Recipient gets (€100) €100.00★ winner €91.53
Platform fee 0%★ winner 8.47%
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00★ winner 0% + €0.00
Trustpilot 3 (21)★ winner — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency France EU★ winner
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 1★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
OnParticipe

€100.00 vs €91.53 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
OnParticipe

3 vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
voordekunst

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose OnParticipe if

French and European organisers running cagnottes, ticketed events, or association fundraising who want a no-commission, French-hosted platform with identity controls, and who will read the terms for inactivity and refund charges.

  • No commission on collections, so organisers keep the entire amount raised and ticket revenue.
  • Designed and hosted in France, with French customer support available seven days a week.
  • Funded by an optional donor tip rather than a mandatory platform charge.
  • Systematic identity-document checks on organisers for fraud control.
Read full review →
Choose voordekunst if

Dutch and Flemish artists, creative makers, and cultural institutions running concrete, project-based campaigns who value sector specialization and hands-on crowdfunding coaching.

  • Deep specialization in arts and culture with vetted, project-based campaigns.
  • Operated by a CBF-recognized charitable foundation with funds held in trust.
  • Hands-on coaching, workshops, and editorial guidance for campaign makers.
  • Supports iDEAL, credit card, PayPal, plus Bancontact, Maestro, and Sofort.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, OnParticipe or voordekunst?

On a €100 donation, OnParticipe delivers approximately €100.00 to the recipient and voordekunst delivers approximately €91.53. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

voordekunst is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

OnParticipe operates in 1 countries; voordekunst operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →