givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

iHelp vs OnParticipe

iHelp logo
iHelp
EU · 1 countries

Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

No rating yet
Read full review →
OnParticipe logo
OnParticipe
France · 1 countries

French and European organisers running cagnottes, ticketed events, or association fundraising who want a no-commission, French-hosted platform with identity controls, and who will read the terms for inactivity and refund charges.

iHelp & OnParticipe don’t process payments in GBP — pricing shown in EUR.

Our verdict

What the data says.

iHelp stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while OnParticipe does not.

On the headline numbers, iHelp and OnParticipe are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric iHelp OnParticipe
Recipient gets (€100) €100.00 €100.00
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00 0% + €0.00
Trustpilot — (0) 3 (21)★ winner
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency EU★ winner France
Languages 2★ winner 1
Payment methods supported 1 1
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Tied

Fees are level on a credit-card donation.

Higher Trustpilot rating
OnParticipe

— vs 3 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
iHelp

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose iHelp if

Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

  • No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
  • NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
  • Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
  • Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.
Read full review →
Choose OnParticipe if

French and European organisers running cagnottes, ticketed events, or association fundraising who want a no-commission, French-hosted platform with identity controls, and who will read the terms for inactivity and refund charges.

  • No commission on collections, so organisers keep the entire amount raised and ticket revenue.
  • Designed and hosted in France, with French customer support available seven days a week.
  • Funded by an optional donor tip rather than a mandatory platform charge.
  • Systematic identity-document checks on organisers for fraud control.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, iHelp or OnParticipe?

On a €100 donation, iHelp delivers approximately €100.00 to the recipient and OnParticipe delivers approximately €100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

iHelp is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

iHelp operates in 1 countries; OnParticipe operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →