givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Steunactie vs Tribee

Steunactie logo
Steunactie
— · 2 countries

Dutch- and French-speaking community fundraisers in the Netherlands and Belgium - sports clubs, schools, churches and local nonprofits - that want a simple, VAT-transparent platform with weekly payouts and no minimum goal.

Tribee logo
Tribee
EU · 1 countries

Friends, families, and colleagues in France organising group gifts or money-pots for occasions such as birthdays, weddings, and farewells who want part of every collection to support an environmental, educational, or health cause.

The headline

On a kr100 donation, Tribee delivers kr6.60 more to the recipient than Steunactie.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Tribee delivers about kr6.60 more of every kr100 donated than Steunactie (kr100.00 vs kr93.40).

Tribee stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Steunactie does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Steunactie Tribee
Recipient gets (kr100) kr93.40 kr100.00★ winner
Platform fee 6% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + kr0.00 0% + kr0.00★ winner
Trustpilot 4.5 (723) 4.7 (2,134)★ winner
Country coverage 2 countries★ winner 1 countries
Data residency EU★ winner
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 4★ winner 1
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Tribee

kr100.00 vs kr93.40 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tribee

4.5 vs 4.7 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Steunactie

2 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tribee

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Steunactie if

Dutch- and French-speaking community fundraisers in the Netherlands and Belgium - sports clubs, schools, churches and local nonprofits - that want a simple, VAT-transparent platform with weekly payouts and no minimum goal.

  • Built for Benelux community causes - clubs, schools, churches and nonprofits - with simple setup.
  • Clear, VAT-inclusive pricing on a small set of common Benelux payment methods.
  • Keep-it-all funding with no minimum target, and weekly payouts that can be paused.
  • Payments handled by PSD2-licensed providers (Mollie, PayPal, Payaut).
Read full review →
Choose Tribee if

Friends, families, and colleagues in France organising group gifts or money-pots for occasions such as birthdays, weddings, and farewells who want part of every collection to support an environmental, educational, or health cause.

  • Combines a familiar online money-pot (cagnotte) with an automatic charitable donation on every collection.
  • Card payments handled by Stripe, including Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Apple Pay, and Google Pay.
  • Registered as an Intermédiaire en Financement Participatif (IFP) with ORIAS, number 23000388.
  • Personal data hosted exclusively on servers within the European Union.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Steunactie or Tribee?

On a kr100 donation, Steunactie delivers approximately kr93.40 to the recipient and Tribee delivers approximately kr100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Tribee is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Steunactie operates in 2 countries; Tribee operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →