givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Produzioni dal Basso vs Yapla

Produzioni dal Basso logo
Produzioni dal Basso
EEA · 1 countries

Italian associations, cultural and social projects, and start-ups that want a flexible, long-established platform with multiple funding models and optional co-financing, and that do not require international reach.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Yapla logo
Yapla
Canada or EU (by org region) · 5 countries

Nonprofits, clubs, and associations in Canada and parts of Europe that want to run donations and fundraising inside a single tool alongside memberships, events, accounting, and contact management.

The headline

On a kr100 donation, Yapla delivers kr0.75 more to the recipient than Produzioni dal Basso.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Produzioni dal Basso stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Yapla does not.

On the headline numbers, Produzioni dal Basso and Yapla are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Produzioni dal Basso Yapla
Recipient gets (kr100) kr95.05 kr95.80★ winner
Platform fee 3% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 1.6% + kr0.35 3.9% + kr0.30★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) 2.3 (6)★ winner
Country coverage 1 countries 5 countries★ winner
Data residency EEA★ winner Canada or EU (by org region)
Languages 1 3★ winner
Payment methods supported 0 4★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Yapla

kr95.80 vs kr95.05 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Yapla

— vs 2.3 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Yapla

5 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Produzioni dal Basso

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Produzioni dal Basso if

Italian associations, cultural and social projects, and start-ups that want a flexible, long-established platform with multiple funding models and optional co-financing, and that do not require international reach.

  • Long-established (since 2005) generalist platform with broad project eligibility.
  • Three funding modes: keep-it-all, all-or-nothing, and simple donation.
  • Run by a benefit corporation; payments via PayPal and regulated Lemonway.
  • Co-financing programs can unlock partner matching past a threshold.
Read full review →
Choose Yapla if

Nonprofits, clubs, and associations in Canada and parts of Europe that want to run donations and fundraising inside a single tool alongside memberships, events, accounting, and contact management.

  • All-in-one suite combining donations and crowdfunding with memberships, events, accounting, newsletters, and a CRM.
  • Available in both French and English, with users in Canada and parts of Europe.
  • Accepts a wide range of payment methods: credit card, Apple Pay, Google Pay, cheque, cash, and bank transfer.
  • Offers an optional donor-contribution model that can cover the cost of payment processing.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Produzioni dal Basso or Yapla?

On a kr100 donation, Produzioni dal Basso delivers approximately kr95.05 to the recipient and Yapla delivers approximately kr95.80. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Produzioni dal Basso is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Produzioni dal Basso operates in 1 countries; Yapla operates in 5.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →