givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Produzioni dal Basso vs Steunactie

Produzioni dal Basso logo
Produzioni dal Basso
EEA · 1 countries

Italian associations, cultural and social projects, and start-ups that want a flexible, long-established platform with multiple funding models and optional co-financing, and that do not require international reach.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Steunactie logo
Steunactie
— · 2 countries

Dutch- and French-speaking community fundraisers in the Netherlands and Belgium - sports clubs, schools, churches and local nonprofits - that want a simple, VAT-transparent platform with weekly payouts and no minimum goal.

The headline

On a kr100 donation, Produzioni dal Basso delivers kr1.65 more to the recipient than Steunactie.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Produzioni dal Basso delivers about kr1.65 more of every kr100 donated than Steunactie (kr95.05 vs kr93.40).

Produzioni dal Basso stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Steunactie does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Produzioni dal Basso Steunactie
Recipient gets (kr100) kr95.05★ winner kr93.40
Platform fee 3%★ winner 6%
Payment processing fee 1.6% + kr0.35★ winner 0% + kr0.00
Trustpilot — (0) 4.5 (723)★ winner
Country coverage 1 countries 2 countries★ winner
Data residency EEA★ winner
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 0 4★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Produzioni dal Basso

kr95.05 vs kr93.40 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Steunactie

— vs 4.5 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Steunactie

2 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Produzioni dal Basso

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Produzioni dal Basso if

Italian associations, cultural and social projects, and start-ups that want a flexible, long-established platform with multiple funding models and optional co-financing, and that do not require international reach.

  • Long-established (since 2005) generalist platform with broad project eligibility.
  • Three funding modes: keep-it-all, all-or-nothing, and simple donation.
  • Run by a benefit corporation; payments via PayPal and regulated Lemonway.
  • Co-financing programs can unlock partner matching past a threshold.
Read full review →
Choose Steunactie if

Dutch- and French-speaking community fundraisers in the Netherlands and Belgium - sports clubs, schools, churches and local nonprofits - that want a simple, VAT-transparent platform with weekly payouts and no minimum goal.

  • Built for Benelux community causes - clubs, schools, churches and nonprofits - with simple setup.
  • Clear, VAT-inclusive pricing on a small set of common Benelux payment methods.
  • Keep-it-all funding with no minimum target, and weekly payouts that can be paused.
  • Payments handled by PSD2-licensed providers (Mollie, PayPal, Payaut).
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Produzioni dal Basso or Steunactie?

On a kr100 donation, Produzioni dal Basso delivers approximately kr95.05 to the recipient and Steunactie delivers approximately kr93.40. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Produzioni dal Basso is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Produzioni dal Basso operates in 1 countries; Steunactie operates in 2.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →