givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

PIFworld vs Supp.to

PIFworld logo
PIFworld
— · 1 countries

Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Supp.to logo
Supp.to
NL · 2 countries

Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Supp.to delivers 5.91 more per 100 to the recipient than PIFworld.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: PIFworld in EUR, Supp.to in SEK.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric PIFworld Supp.to
Recipient gets (per 100) €93.60 kr99.51★ winner
Platform fee 6.05% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.35 0% + kr0.49★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 2 countries★ winner
Data residency NL
Languages 2 2
Payment methods supported 0 17★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Supp.to

kr99.51 vs €93.60 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Supp.to

2 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose PIFworld if

Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

  • Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
  • Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
  • Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
  • Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.
Read full review →
Choose Supp.to if

Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

  • Flat per-donation fee on iDEAL and Wero (EUR 0.49) rather than a percentage cut, inclusive of 21% VAT.
  • No hidden costs and no mandatory donor tip - you pay only for successful donations.
  • Payments via Mollie Payments B.V., licensed under the Wft and supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank.
  • Keep-it-all funding model - funds are paid out even if the target is not reached.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, PIFworld or Supp.to?

Of every 100 donated, PIFworld delivers approximately €93.60 to the recipient and Supp.to delivers approximately kr99.51. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

PIFworld operates in 1 countries; Supp.to operates in 2.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →