givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Migranodearena vs Teaming

Migranodearena logo
Migranodearena
— · 1 countries

Spain-based nonprofits, companies, and individual fundraisers who want a high-reach solidarity crowdfunding marketplace with transparent, openly published fees, recurring-donation support, and Bizum, and who can accept monthly payouts.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Teaming logo
Teaming
— · 0 countries

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

The headline

Of every 100 donated, Teaming delivers 6.45 more per 100 to the recipient than Migranodearena.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Migranodearena in EUR, Teaming in SEK.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Migranodearena Teaming
Recipient gets (per 100) €93.55 kr100.00★ winner
Platform fee 5% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 1.2% + €0.25 0% + kr0.00★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) 3 (9)★ winner
Country coverage 1 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency
Languages 3★ winner 0
Payment methods supported 3★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Teaming

kr100.00 vs €93.55 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Teaming

— vs 3 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Migranodearena

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Migranodearena if

Spain-based nonprofits, companies, and individual fundraisers who want a high-reach solidarity crowdfunding marketplace with transparent, openly published fees, recurring-donation support, and Bizum, and who can accept monthly payouts.

  • Large reach: more than 4,800 NGOs raise funds through the platform.
  • Open to all creator types, including individuals, companies, collectives, and NGOs.
  • Keep-it-all model: funds are released to the cause whether or not the goal is met.
  • Transparent, openly published commission and payment-processing fees.
Read full review →
Choose Teaming if

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

  • Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
  • Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
  • Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
  • Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Migranodearena or Teaming?

Of every 100 donated, Migranodearena delivers approximately €93.55 to the recipient and Teaming delivers approximately kr100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Migranodearena operates in 1 countries; Teaming operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →