givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Kagnotte vs Teaming

Kagnotte logo
Kagnotte
— · 1 countries

French and EEA-based organisers running social group pots or association fundraising who want low, transparent per-contribution pricing and unlimited payouts at no extra cost, and who don't need an English-first international experience.

Teaming logo
Teaming
— · 0 countries

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

The headline

Of every 100 donated, Teaming delivers 1.25 more per 100 to the recipient than Kagnotte.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Kagnotte in EUR, Teaming in SEK.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Kagnotte Teaming
Recipient gets (per 100) €98.75 kr100.00★ winner
Platform fee 1% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00 0% + kr0.00★ winner
Trustpilot 3.9 (233)★ winner 3 (9)
Country coverage 1 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency
Languages 1★ winner 0
Payment methods supported 2★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Teaming

kr100.00 vs €98.75 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Kagnotte

3.9 vs 3 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Kagnotte

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Kagnotte if

French and EEA-based organisers running social group pots or association fundraising who want low, transparent per-contribution pricing and unlimited payouts at no extra cost, and who don't need an English-first international experience.

  • Low headline pricing: a small per-contribution commission plus a fixed amount, undercutting many higher-rate rivals.
  • Unlimited withdrawals to a bank account at no additional charge.
  • No subscription or setup cost to create and manage a pot.
  • Regulated fund custody via Lemonway, authorised by France's ACPR (no. 16568).
Read full review →
Choose Teaming if

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

  • Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
  • Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
  • Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
  • Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Kagnotte or Teaming?

Of every 100 donated, Kagnotte delivers approximately €98.75 to the recipient and Teaming delivers approximately kr100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Kagnotte operates in 1 countries; Teaming operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →