iRaiser vs Teaming
Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.
European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.
On a kr100 donation, Teaming delivers kr2.15 more to the recipient than iRaiser.
What the data says.
Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about kr2.15 more of every kr100 donated than iRaiser (kr100.00 vs kr97.85).
iRaiser stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Teaming does not.
Per-method pricing vs Teaming.
| Payment method | Per transaction | Of kr100, recipient gets | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| iDEAL | kr0.29 flat | kr99.71 | 0% platform fee |
| SEPA Direct Debit | 0.35% + kr0.25 | kr99.40 | 0% platform fee |
| Credit card | 1.9% + kr0.25 | kr97.85 | 0% platform fee |
Side-by-side.
| Metric | iRaiser | Teaming |
|---|---|---|
| Recipient gets (kr100) | kr97.85 | kr100.00★ winner |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.9% + kr0.25 | 0% + kr0.00★ winner |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10)★ winner |
| Country coverage | 19 countries★ winner | 0 countries |
| Data residency | EEA★ winner | — |
| Languages | 5★ winner | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 23★ winner | 0 |
Winner by category.
kr100.00 vs kr97.85 reaches the recipient.
— vs 2.8 on Trustpilot.
19 vs 0 countries.
EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.
Choose based on who you are.
Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.
- ✓Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
- ✓Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
- ✓Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
- ✓Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.
European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.
- ✓Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- ✓Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- ✓Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- ✓Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.
A third option.
Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.
Other comparisons.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, iRaiser or Teaming?
On a kr100 donation, iRaiser delivers approximately kr97.85 to the recipient and Teaming delivers approximately kr100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.
Which is better for European nonprofits?
iRaiser is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.
Which platform has more country coverage?
iRaiser operates in 19 countries; Teaming operates in 0.
Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.