givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-11 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

impactory vs Supp.to

impactory logo
impactory
— · 1 countries

Austrian non-profit organisations and associations that want a locally compliant donation tool with automated tax-deductibility receipts and simple card or Klarna giving.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Supp.to logo
Supp.to
NL · 2 countries

Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Supp.to delivers 5.51 more per 100 to the recipient than impactory.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: impactory in EUR, Supp.to in SEK.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric impactory Supp.to
Recipient gets (per 100) €94.00 kr99.51★ winner
Platform fee 6% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00 0% + kr0.49★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 2 countries★ winner
Data residency NL
Languages 2 2
Payment methods supported 6 17★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Supp.to

kr99.51 vs €94.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Supp.to

2 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose impactory if

Austrian non-profit organisations and associations that want a locally compliant donation tool with automated tax-deductibility receipts and simple card or Klarna giving.

  • Automated Austrian tax-deductibility: donation receipts downloadable as PDF or emailed for organisations with charitable status.
  • Positions itself as Austria's largest donation platform, hosting a few hundred projects from vetted non-profit organisations.
  • Organisations are screened before they can publish, adding a layer of donor trust.
  • Donors can give as a one-off guest or through a free account that tracks their cumulative giving.
Read full review →
Choose Supp.to if

Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

  • Flat per-donation fee on iDEAL and Wero (EUR 0.49) rather than a percentage cut, inclusive of 21% VAT.
  • No hidden costs and no mandatory donor tip - you pay only for successful donations.
  • Payments via Mollie Payments B.V., licensed under the Wft and supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank.
  • Keep-it-all funding model - funds are paid out even if the target is not reached.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, impactory or Supp.to?

Of every 100 donated, impactory delivers approximately €94.00 to the recipient and Supp.to delivers approximately kr99.51. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

impactory operates in 1 countries; Supp.to operates in 2.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →