givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-10 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

iDonate.ie vs Teaming

iDonate.ie logo
iDonate.ie
EEA · 1 countries

Irish charities, clubs, schools, and community causes that want low transaction-only fees and a broad set of fundraising tools, including donation pages, crowdfunders, raffles, and events.

Teaming logo
Teaming
— · 0 countries

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

The headline

Of every 100 donated, Teaming delivers 2.20 more per 100 to the recipient than iDonate.ie.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: iDonate.ie in EUR, Teaming in SEK.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about 2.20 more of every 100 donated than iDonate.ie (kr100.00 vs €97.80 per 100).

iDonate.ie holds the stronger Trustpilot record: 4.9/5 across 507 reviews, against 2.8/5 across 10 for Teaming.

iDonate.ie stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Teaming does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric iDonate.ie Teaming
Recipient gets (per 100) €97.80 kr100.00★ winner
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 1.95% + €0.25 0% + kr0.00★ winner
Trustpilot 4.9 (507)★ winner 2.8 (10)
Country coverage 1 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency EEA★ winner
Languages 1★ winner 0
Payment methods supported 4★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Teaming

kr100.00 vs €97.80 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
iDonate.ie

4.9 vs 2.8 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
iDonate.ie

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
iDonate.ie

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose iDonate.ie if

Irish charities, clubs, schools, and community causes that want low transaction-only fees and a broad set of fundraising tools, including donation pages, crowdfunders, raffles, and events.

  • 0% platform fee with a transaction-only cost of 1.95% + EUR0.25 per donation.
  • No setup or monthly fees.
  • Donor-covers-the-fee option can reduce the net deduction for causes.
  • Broad fundraising toolkit: donation pages, crowdfunders, raffles, and event fundraising.
Read full review →
Choose Teaming if

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

  • Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
  • Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
  • Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
  • Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, iDonate.ie or Teaming?

Of every 100 donated, iDonate.ie delivers approximately €97.80 to the recipient and Teaming delivers approximately kr100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

iDonate.ie is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

iDonate.ie operates in 1 countries; Teaming operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →