givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Donorbox vs Yapla

Donorbox logo
Donorbox
— · 23 countries

Small-to-medium nonprofits across verticals like churches, healthcare, education, and animal welfare that want recurring-donation tooling, donor fee-cover, and a managed donation-form product without a CRM-scale platform commitment.

Yapla logo
Yapla
— · 5 countries

Nonprofits, clubs, and associations in Canada and parts of Europe that want to run donations and fundraising inside a single tool alongside memberships, events, accounting, and contact management.

The headline

On a kr100 donation, Yapla delivers kr1.25 more to the recipient than Donorbox.

Fees by method · Sweden

Per-method pricing vs Yapla.

Payment method Per transaction Of kr100, recipient gets Notes
iDEAL 2.95% + kr0.29 kr96.76 2.95% platform fee + flat iDEAL processing.
SEPA Direct Debit 3.3% + kr0.25 kr96.45 2.95% platform fee + SEPA Direct Debit processing.
Credit card 5.15% + kr0.30 kr94.55 2.95% platform fee + 2.2% + EUR 0.30 Stripe card.
The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Donorbox Yapla
Recipient gets (kr100) kr94.55 kr95.80★ winner
Platform fee 2.95% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 2.2% + kr0.30 3.9% + kr0.30★ winner
Trustpilot 4 (52)★ winner 2.3 (6)
Country coverage 23 countries★ winner 5 countries
Data residency
Languages 12★ winner 3
Payment methods supported 19★ winner 4
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Yapla

kr95.80 vs kr94.55 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Donorbox

4 vs 2.3 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Donorbox

23 vs 5 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Donorbox if

Small-to-medium nonprofits across verticals like churches, healthcare, education, and animal welfare that want recurring-donation tooling, donor fee-cover, and a managed donation-form product without a CRM-scale platform commitment.

  • Donor-cover-fees option at checkout — Donorbox frames opt-in as the default, so the recipient can receive the full donation amount.
  • Broad payment-rail support: iDEAL, Bancontact, SEPA, BACS, Klarna, PayPal, Venmo, Cash App, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Amazon Pay, and Link by Stripe.
  • Standard plan has no monthly subscription — just per-transaction fees on the 2.95% / 3.95% tier.
  • First-class recurring-donation tooling with upsell prompts and donor-management features on the Pro tier.
Read full review →
Choose Yapla if

Nonprofits, clubs, and associations in Canada and parts of Europe that want to run donations and fundraising inside a single tool alongside memberships, events, accounting, and contact management.

  • All-in-one suite combining donations and crowdfunding with memberships, events, accounting, newsletters, and a CRM.
  • Available in both French and English, with users in Canada and parts of Europe.
  • Accepts a wide range of payment methods: credit card, Apple Pay, Google Pay, cheque, cash, and bank transfer.
  • Offers an optional donor-contribution model that can cover the cost of payment processing.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Donorbox or Yapla?

On a kr100 donation, Donorbox delivers approximately kr94.55 to the recipient and Yapla delivers approximately kr95.80. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Donorbox operates in 23 countries; Yapla operates in 5.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →