givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Continue to Give vs Teaming

C
Continue to Give
— · 2 countries

US and Canadian churches, faith-based nonprofits, and missionaries that want an all-in-one giving platform with recurring and text giving, event tools, and built-in fund accounting.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Teaming logo
Teaming
— · 0 countries

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

The headline

On a kr100 donation, Teaming delivers kr2.95 more to the recipient than Continue to Give.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Continue to Give Teaming
Recipient gets (kr100) kr97.05 kr100.00★ winner
Platform fee 2.7% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + kr0.00 0% + kr0.00★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) 3 (9)★ winner
Country coverage 2 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency
Languages 0 0
Payment methods supported 0 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Teaming

kr100.00 vs kr97.05 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Teaming

— vs 3 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Continue to Give

2 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Continue to Give if

US and Canadian churches, faith-based nonprofits, and missionaries that want an all-in-one giving platform with recurring and text giving, event tools, and built-in fund accounting.

  • All-in-one toolkit: online giving, recurring and text giving, event registration, newsletters, and built-in fund accounting.
  • Explicit faith-based positioning with a pledge not to deplatform organizations over their faith.
  • Tiered plans including a no-monthly-cost Silver tier and a Gold tier with interchange-plus card rates.
  • Optional donor-covers-fees toggle so organizations can receive the full donation amount.
Read full review →
Choose Teaming if

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

  • Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
  • Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
  • Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
  • Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Continue to Give or Teaming?

On a kr100 donation, Continue to Give delivers approximately kr97.05 to the recipient and Teaming delivers approximately kr100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Continue to Give operates in 2 countries; Teaming operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →