givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Continue to Give vs Petje Af

C
Continue to Give
— · 2 countries

US and Canadian churches, faith-based nonprofits, and missionaries that want an all-in-one giving platform with recurring and text giving, event tools, and built-in fund accounting.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Petje Af logo
Petje Af
— · 0 countries

Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

On a kr100 donation, Continue to Give delivers kr3.05 more to the recipient than Petje Af.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Continue to Give Petje Af
Recipient gets (kr100) kr97.05★ winner kr94.00
Platform fee 2.7%★ winner 6%
Payment processing fee 0% + kr0.00★ winner 0% + kr0.00
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 2 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency
Languages 0 0
Payment methods supported 0 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Continue to Give

kr97.05 vs kr94.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Continue to Give

2 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Continue to Give if

US and Canadian churches, faith-based nonprofits, and missionaries that want an all-in-one giving platform with recurring and text giving, event tools, and built-in fund accounting.

  • All-in-one toolkit: online giving, recurring and text giving, event registration, newsletters, and built-in fund accounting.
  • Explicit faith-based positioning with a pledge not to deplatform organizations over their faith.
  • Tiered plans including a no-monthly-cost Silver tier and a Gold tier with interchange-plus card rates.
  • Optional donor-covers-fees toggle so organizations can receive the full donation amount.
Read full review →
Choose Petje Af if

Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

  • Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
  • Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
  • No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
  • Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Continue to Give or Petje Af?

On a kr100 donation, Continue to Give delivers approximately kr97.05 to the recipient and Petje Af delivers approximately kr94.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Continue to Give operates in 2 countries; Petje Af operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →