givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Chuffed vs Teaming

Chuffed logo
Chuffed
— · 29 countries

Nonprofits, social enterprises, and community-cause organisers in 29 supported countries who want a 100%-free, tip-funded platform and are willing to complete identity verification before launching.

Teaming logo
Teaming
— · 0 countries

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

The headline

On a kr100 donation, Teaming delivers kr7.80 more to the recipient than Chuffed.

Fees by method · Sweden

Per-method pricing vs Teaming.

Payment method Per transaction Of kr100, recipient gets Notes
Credit card 7.8% + kr0.00 kr92.20 4.9% platform (VAT-inclusive ~5.9%) + ~2.9% card; EU campaigners absorb both.
The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Chuffed Teaming
Recipient gets (kr100) kr92.20 kr100.00★ winner
Platform fee 4.9% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 2.9% + kr0.00 0% + kr0.00★ winner
Trustpilot 4.8 (665)★ winner 3 (9)
Country coverage 29 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency
Languages 4★ winner 0
Payment methods supported 5★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Teaming

kr100.00 vs kr92.20 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Chuffed

4.8 vs 3 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Chuffed

29 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Chuffed if

Nonprofits, social enterprises, and community-cause organisers in 29 supported countries who want a 100%-free, tip-funded platform and are willing to complete identity verification before launching.

  • Free to launch — no signup or monthly fees.
  • Optional donor-tip model can make campaigns effectively free to run.
  • Three flexible fee structures (keep-100%, shared, and flat-fee) to suit different campaigns.
  • Mission-aligned: operates as a Social Benefit Company weighing social and community impact.
Read full review →
Choose Teaming if

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

  • Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
  • Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
  • Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
  • Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Chuffed or Teaming?

On a kr100 donation, Chuffed delivers approximately kr92.20 to the recipient and Teaming delivers approximately kr100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Chuffed operates in 29 countries; Teaming operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →