givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-11 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Charitable Impact vs Teaming

Charitable Impact logo
Charitable Impact
— · 1 countries

Canadian individuals and families who want a single donor-advised Impact Account to organize their giving, support friends' causes, and receive a tax receipt for every contribution they add.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Teaming logo
Teaming
— · 0 countries

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

The headline

Of every 100 donated, Teaming delivers 2.80 more per 100 to the recipient than Charitable Impact.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Charitable Impact in CAD, Teaming in NZD.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Charitable Impact Teaming
Recipient gets (per 100) C$97.20 NZ$100.00★ winner
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 2.8% + C$0.00 0% + NZ$0.00★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) 2.8 (10)★ winner
Country coverage 1 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency
Languages 1★ winner 0
Payment methods supported 5★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Teaming

NZ$100.00 vs C$97.20 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Teaming

— vs 2.8 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Charitable Impact

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Charitable Impact if

Canadian individuals and families who want a single donor-advised Impact Account to organize their giving, support friends' causes, and receive a tax receipt for every contribution they add.

  • Operates as a donor-advised fund: donors add money to an Impact Account and recommend gifts to charities over time.
  • A tax receipt is issued for the full amount added to the Impact Account, regardless of when it is granted to charities.
  • Accepts a wide range of assets, including cash, securities, real estate, and cryptocurrency.
  • Peer-to-peer giving, Giving Groups, and campaigns let donors pool and direct money together.
Read full review →
Choose Teaming if

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

  • Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
  • Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
  • Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
  • Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Charitable Impact or Teaming?

Of every 100 donated, Charitable Impact delivers approximately C$97.20 to the recipient and Teaming delivers approximately NZ$100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Charitable Impact operates in 1 countries; Teaming operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →