givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Doneerveilig vs Tribee

Doneerveilig logo
Doneerveilig
— · 0 countries

Dutch and Belgian individuals running personal fundraising campaigns who prioritise a security-focused, PSD2-compliant platform with escrow handling and a simple, quick setup.

Tribee logo
Tribee
EU · 1 countries

Friends, families, and colleagues in France organising group gifts or money-pots for occasions such as birthdays, weddings, and farewells who want part of every collection to support an environmental, educational, or health cause.

The headline

On a €100 donation, Tribee delivers €7.66 more to the recipient than Doneerveilig.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Tribee delivers about €7.66 more of every €100 donated than Doneerveilig (€100.00 vs €92.34).

Tribee holds the stronger Trustpilot record: 4.7/5 across 2,134 reviews, against 2.9/5 across 44 for Doneerveilig.

Tribee stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Doneerveilig does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Doneerveilig Tribee
Recipient gets (€100) €92.34 €100.00★ winner
Platform fee 6.7% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00 0% + €0.00★ winner
Trustpilot 2.9 (44) 4.7 (2,134)★ winner
Country coverage 0 countries 1 countries★ winner
Data residency EU★ winner
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 2★ winner 1
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Tribee

€100.00 vs €92.34 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tribee

2.9 vs 4.7 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tribee

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tribee

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Doneerveilig if

Dutch and Belgian individuals running personal fundraising campaigns who prioritise a security-focused, PSD2-compliant platform with escrow handling and a simple, quick setup.

  • Security-focused framing: PSD2 compliance supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank, escrow handling, and SSL.
  • Donations held on a third-party escrow account (derdengeldenrekening) before payout.
  • Quick, simple campaign setup aimed at individual causes.
  • Account verification via a one-cent micro-transfer.
Read full review →
Choose Tribee if

Friends, families, and colleagues in France organising group gifts or money-pots for occasions such as birthdays, weddings, and farewells who want part of every collection to support an environmental, educational, or health cause.

  • Combines a familiar online money-pot (cagnotte) with an automatic charitable donation on every collection.
  • Card payments handled by Stripe, including Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Apple Pay, and Google Pay.
  • Registered as an Intermédiaire en Financement Participatif (IFP) with ORIAS, number 23000388.
  • Personal data hosted exclusively on servers within the European Union.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Doneerveilig or Tribee?

On a €100 donation, Doneerveilig delivers approximately €92.34 to the recipient and Tribee delivers approximately €100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Tribee is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Doneerveilig operates in 0 countries; Tribee operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →