givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

BuonaCausa vs Yapla

BuonaCausa logo
BuonaCausa
EU · 1 countries

Italian associations, nonprofits, and individuals who want a no-commission way to collect donations directly into their own accounts, and campaigners who pair fundraising with online petitions and activism.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Yapla logo
Yapla
Canada or EU (by org region) · 5 countries

Nonprofits, clubs, and associations in Canada and parts of Europe that want to run donations and fundraising inside a single tool alongside memberships, events, accounting, and contact management.

The headline

On a €100 donation, BuonaCausa delivers €4.20 more to the recipient than Yapla.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, BuonaCausa delivers about €4.20 more of every €100 donated than Yapla (€100.00 vs €95.80).

BuonaCausa stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Yapla does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric BuonaCausa Yapla
Recipient gets (€100) €100.00★ winner €95.80
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00★ winner 3.9% + €0.30
Trustpilot — (0) 2.3 (6)★ winner
Country coverage 1 countries 5 countries★ winner
Data residency EU★ winner Canada or EU (by org region)
Languages 1 3★ winner
Payment methods supported 4 4
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
BuonaCausa

€100.00 vs €95.80 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Yapla

— vs 2.3 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Yapla

5 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
BuonaCausa

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose BuonaCausa if

Italian associations, nonprofits, and individuals who want a no-commission way to collect donations directly into their own accounts, and campaigners who pair fundraising with online petitions and activism.

  • Donations are paid directly into the organiser's own bank, PayPal, or postal account without platform intermediation
  • No platform commission charged on donations
  • Reduced third-party processing costs for recognised nonprofit (ONLUS) organisations
  • Combines donation fundraising with online petitions and activism on one platform
Read full review →
Choose Yapla if

Nonprofits, clubs, and associations in Canada and parts of Europe that want to run donations and fundraising inside a single tool alongside memberships, events, accounting, and contact management.

  • All-in-one suite combining donations and crowdfunding with memberships, events, accounting, newsletters, and a CRM.
  • Available in both French and English, with users in Canada and parts of Europe.
  • Accepts a wide range of payment methods: credit card, Apple Pay, Google Pay, cheque, cash, and bank transfer.
  • Offers an optional donor-contribution model that can cover the cost of payment processing.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, BuonaCausa or Yapla?

On a €100 donation, BuonaCausa delivers approximately €100.00 to the recipient and Yapla delivers approximately €95.80. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

BuonaCausa is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

BuonaCausa operates in 1 countries; Yapla operates in 5.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →