givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

BetterWorld vs Enthuse

BetterWorld logo
BetterWorld
— · 0 countries

Nonprofits, schools, PTOs, and community groups in the US running auctions, raffles, events, and peer-to-peer campaigns that want every fundraising tool available on every plan.

Enthuse logo
Enthuse
UK/EEA · 1 countries

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

The headline

On a €100 donation, BetterWorld delivers €1.80 more to the recipient than Enthuse.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, BetterWorld delivers about €1.80 more of every €100 donated than Enthuse (€96.80 vs €95.00).

Enthuse holds the stronger Trustpilot record: 4.6/5 across 410 reviews, against 2.9/5 across 2 for BetterWorld.

Enthuse stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while BetterWorld does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric BetterWorld Enthuse
Recipient gets (€100) €96.80★ winner €95.00
Platform fee 0%★ winner 5%
Payment processing fee 2.9% + €0.30★ winner 0% + €0.00
Trustpilot 2.9 (2) 4.6 (410)★ winner
Country coverage 0 countries 1 countries★ winner
Data residency UK/EEA★ winner
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 5★ winner 1
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
BetterWorld

€96.80 vs €95.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Enthuse

2.9 vs 4.6 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Enthuse

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Enthuse

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose BetterWorld if

Nonprofits, schools, PTOs, and community groups in the US running auctions, raffles, events, and peer-to-peer campaigns that want every fundraising tool available on every plan.

  • Exceptionally broad format support: silent and live auctions, raffles, events, donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, paddle raise, and a-thons.
  • No feature gating - every fundraising tool is available even on the free entry plan.
  • Paid Partner ($1,550/year) and Keystone ($5,950/year) tiers lower the platform's percentage cut for higher-volume organizations.
  • Most donors (over 95%) opt to cover payment processing, so organizations retain more of each gift.
Read full review →
Choose Enthuse if

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

  • White-label donation, fundraising, and event-registration pages presented under the charity's own brand.
  • Combines online donations, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event ticketing in a single platform.
  • Registered with the UK Financial Conduct Authority as a Small Payment Institution (firm reference 797344).
  • Payments processed through established providers Stripe, GoCardless, and PayPal.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, BetterWorld or Enthuse?

On a €100 donation, BetterWorld delivers approximately €96.80 to the recipient and Enthuse delivers approximately €95.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Enthuse is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

BetterWorld operates in 0 countries; Enthuse operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →