givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-01 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

iRaiser vs 1%Club

iRaiser logo
iRaiser
— · 19 countries

Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

No rating yet
Read full review →
1
1%Club
— · 0 countries

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, 1%Club delivers 2.15 more per 100 to the recipient than iRaiser.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: iRaiser in AUD, 1%Club in EUR.

Fees by method · Australia

Per-method pricing.

Payment method Per transaction Of A$100, recipient gets Notes
iDEAL A$99.71 Flat iDEAL fee passed through at cost; platform priced by subscription.
SEPA Direct Debit 0.35% + A$0.25 A$99.40 SEPA Direct Debit at cost; platform priced by subscription.
Credit card 1.9% + A$0.25 A$97.85 Card processing at cost; no per-donation platform fee (subscription-priced).
The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric iRaiser 1%Club
Recipient gets (per 100) A$97.85 €100.00★ winner
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 1.9% + A$0.25 0% + €0.00★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 19 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency
Languages 5★ winner 2
Payment methods supported 23★ winner 2
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
1%Club

€100.00 vs A$97.85 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
iRaiser

19 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose iRaiser if

Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

  • Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
  • Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
  • Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
  • Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.
Read full review →
Choose 1%Club if

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

  • Mission-driven focus on social initiatives aligned with the UN Global Goals.
  • Personal coaching of campaign initiators rather than a purely self-serve model.
  • Bilingual Dutch and English interface.
  • Accepts donations in euros and US dollars.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

4fund.com

Individuals, charities, and small organisations across the EEA who want a multilingual, no-commission fundraiser backed by an established Polish crowdfunding operator with EU payment-institution licensing.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, iRaiser or 1%Club?

Of every 100 donated, iRaiser delivers approximately A$97.85 to the recipient and 1%Club delivers approximately €100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

iRaiser operates in 19 countries; 1%Club operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →