givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Doneerveilig vs Petje Af

Doneerveilig logo
Doneerveilig
— · 0 countries

Dutch and Belgian individuals running personal fundraising campaigns who prioritise a security-focused, PSD2-compliant platform with escrow handling and a simple, quick setup.

Petje Af logo
Petje Af
— · 0 countries

Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Petje Af delivers 1.66 more per 100 to the recipient than Doneerveilig.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Doneerveilig in EUR, Petje Af in AUD.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Doneerveilig Petje Af
Recipient gets (per 100) €92.34 A$94.00★ winner
Platform fee 6.7% 6%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00 0% + A$0.00★ winner
Trustpilot 2.9 (44)★ winner — (0)
Country coverage 0 countries 0 countries
Data residency
Languages 1★ winner 0
Payment methods supported 2★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Petje Af

A$94.00 vs €92.34 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Doneerveilig

2.9 vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

0 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Doneerveilig if

Dutch and Belgian individuals running personal fundraising campaigns who prioritise a security-focused, PSD2-compliant platform with escrow handling and a simple, quick setup.

  • Security-focused framing: PSD2 compliance supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank, escrow handling, and SSL.
  • Donations held on a third-party escrow account (derdengeldenrekening) before payout.
  • Quick, simple campaign setup aimed at individual causes.
  • Account verification via a one-cent micro-transfer.
Read full review →
Choose Petje Af if

Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

  • Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
  • Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
  • No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
  • Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Doneerveilig or Petje Af?

Of every 100 donated, Doneerveilig delivers approximately €92.34 to the recipient and Petje Af delivers approximately A$94.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Doneerveilig operates in 0 countries; Petje Af operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →