givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-03 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Supp.to vs voordekunst

Supp.to logo
Supp.to
NL · 2 countries

Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

No rating yet
Read full review →
voordekunst logo
voordekunst
EU · 1 countries

Dutch and Flemish artists, creative makers, and cultural institutions running concrete, project-based campaigns who value sector specialization and hands-on crowdfunding coaching.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Supp.to delivers 7.98 more per 100 to the recipient than voordekunst.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Supp.to in GBP, voordekunst in EUR.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Supp.to delivers about 7.98 more of every 100 donated than voordekunst (£99.51 vs €91.53 per 100).

voordekunst stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Supp.to does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Supp.to voordekunst
Recipient gets (per 100) £99.51★ winner €91.53
Platform fee 0%★ winner 8.47%
Payment processing fee 0% + £0.49★ winner 0% + €0.00
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 2 countries★ winner 1 countries
Data residency NL EU★ winner
Languages 2★ winner 1
Payment methods supported 17★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Supp.to

£99.51 vs €91.53 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Supp.to

2 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
voordekunst

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Supp.to if

Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

  • Flat per-donation fee on iDEAL and Wero (EUR 0.49) rather than a percentage cut, inclusive of 21% VAT.
  • No hidden costs and no mandatory donor tip - you pay only for successful donations.
  • Payments via Mollie Payments B.V., licensed under the Wft and supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank.
  • Keep-it-all funding model - funds are paid out even if the target is not reached.
Read full review →
Choose voordekunst if

Dutch and Flemish artists, creative makers, and cultural institutions running concrete, project-based campaigns who value sector specialization and hands-on crowdfunding coaching.

  • Deep specialization in arts and culture with vetted, project-based campaigns.
  • Operated by a CBF-recognized charitable foundation with funds held in trust.
  • Hands-on coaching, workshops, and editorial guidance for campaign makers.
  • Supports iDEAL, credit card, PayPal, plus Bancontact, Maestro, and Sofort.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Supp.to or voordekunst?

Of every 100 donated, Supp.to delivers approximately £99.51 to the recipient and voordekunst delivers approximately €91.53. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

voordekunst is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Supp.to operates in 2 countries; voordekunst operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →