givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

PIFworld vs Produzioni dal Basso

PIFworld logo
PIFworld
— · 1 countries

Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Produzioni dal Basso logo
Produzioni dal Basso
EEA · 1 countries

Italian associations, cultural and social projects, and start-ups that want a flexible, long-established platform with multiple funding models and optional co-financing, and that do not require international reach.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Produzioni dal Basso delivers 1.45 more per 100 to the recipient than PIFworld.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: PIFworld in EUR, Produzioni dal Basso in GBP.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Produzioni dal Basso delivers about 1.45 more of every 100 donated than PIFworld (£95.05 vs €93.60 per 100).

Produzioni dal Basso stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while PIFworld does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric PIFworld Produzioni dal Basso
Recipient gets (per 100) €93.60 £95.05★ winner
Platform fee 6.05% 3%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.35 1.6% + £0.35★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency EEA★ winner
Languages 2★ winner 1
Payment methods supported 0 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Produzioni dal Basso

£95.05 vs €93.60 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Produzioni dal Basso

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose PIFworld if

Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

  • Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
  • Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
  • Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
  • Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.
Read full review →
Choose Produzioni dal Basso if

Italian associations, cultural and social projects, and start-ups that want a flexible, long-established platform with multiple funding models and optional co-financing, and that do not require international reach.

  • Long-established (since 2005) generalist platform with broad project eligibility.
  • Three funding modes: keep-it-all, all-or-nothing, and simple donation.
  • Run by a benefit corporation; payments via PayPal and regulated Lemonway.
  • Co-financing programs can unlock partner matching past a threshold.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, PIFworld or Produzioni dal Basso?

Of every 100 donated, PIFworld delivers approximately €93.60 to the recipient and Produzioni dal Basso delivers approximately £95.05. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Produzioni dal Basso is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

PIFworld operates in 1 countries; Produzioni dal Basso operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →