givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-10 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Mesenaatti.me vs WhyDonate

M
Mesenaatti.me
EEA · 1 countries

Finnish artists, associations, nonprofits, and startups running reward-based or donation crowdfunding in euro who want a domestic platform that handles Finnish fundraising-permit requirements.

No rating yet
Read full review →
WhyDonate logo
WhyDonate
EEA · 115 countries

European nonprofits and individuals who want a transparent, low-fee, GDPR-native crowdfunding platform with broad multilingual and multi-currency support.

The headline

Of every 100 donated, WhyDonate delivers 14.35 more per 100 to the recipient than Mesenaatti.me.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Mesenaatti.me in EUR, WhyDonate in GBP.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, WhyDonate delivers about 13.85 more of every 100 donated than Mesenaatti.me (£97.85 vs €84.00 per 100).

On the headline numbers, Mesenaatti.me and WhyDonate are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Mesenaatti.me WhyDonate
Recipient gets (per 100) €84.00 £98.35★ winner
Platform fee 15% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €1.00 1.4% + £0.25★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) 4.9 (388)★ winner
Country coverage 1 countries 115 countries★ winner
Data residency EEA EEA
Languages 1 19★ winner
Payment methods supported 1 24★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
WhyDonate

£98.35 vs €84.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
WhyDonate

— vs 4.9 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
WhyDonate

115 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Mesenaatti.me if

Finnish artists, associations, nonprofits, and startups running reward-based or donation crowdfunding in euro who want a domestic platform that handles Finnish fundraising-permit requirements.

  • Finland's largest home-grown crowdfunding platform, established since 2012.
  • Supports both reward-based and donation-based crowdfunding.
  • Handles the Finnish fundraising-permit requirements for donation campaigns.
  • All-or-nothing model refunds backers in full if a campaign misses its target.
Read full review →
Choose WhyDonate if

European nonprofits and individuals who want a transparent, low-fee, GDPR-native crowdfunding platform with broad multilingual and multi-currency support.

  • Zero platform fee with a transparent voluntary-tip model
  • EEA data residency and GDPR-native compliance
  • Broad coverage of local European payment rails (iDEAL, Bancontact, Klarna, Twint, Swish, MobilePay, Vipps, Blik, Cartes Bancaires, Satispay, MultiBanco, EPS) plus global rails (cards, PayPal, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Amazon Pay, Link, Revolut Pay)
  • 19-language interface and 27 supported currencies for cross-border fundraising
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Mesenaatti.me or WhyDonate?

Of every 100 donated, Mesenaatti.me delivers approximately €84.00 to the recipient and WhyDonate delivers approximately £98.35. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Mesenaatti.me operates in 1 countries; WhyDonate operates in 115.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →