givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-10 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Mesenaatti.me vs Teaming

M
Mesenaatti.me
EEA · 1 countries

Finnish artists, associations, nonprofits, and startups running reward-based or donation crowdfunding in euro who want a domestic platform that handles Finnish fundraising-permit requirements.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Teaming logo
Teaming
— · 0 countries

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

The headline

Of every 100 donated, Teaming delivers 16.00 more per 100 to the recipient than Mesenaatti.me.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Mesenaatti.me in EUR, Teaming in GBP.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about 16.00 more of every 100 donated than Mesenaatti.me (£100.00 vs €84.00 per 100).

Mesenaatti.me stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Teaming does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Mesenaatti.me Teaming
Recipient gets (per 100) €84.00 £100.00★ winner
Platform fee 15% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €1.00 0% + £0.00★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) 2.8 (10)★ winner
Country coverage 1 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency EEA★ winner
Languages 1★ winner 0
Payment methods supported 1★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Teaming

£100.00 vs €84.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Teaming

— vs 2.8 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Mesenaatti.me

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Mesenaatti.me

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Mesenaatti.me if

Finnish artists, associations, nonprofits, and startups running reward-based or donation crowdfunding in euro who want a domestic platform that handles Finnish fundraising-permit requirements.

  • Finland's largest home-grown crowdfunding platform, established since 2012.
  • Supports both reward-based and donation-based crowdfunding.
  • Handles the Finnish fundraising-permit requirements for donation campaigns.
  • All-or-nothing model refunds backers in full if a campaign misses its target.
Read full review →
Choose Teaming if

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

  • Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
  • Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
  • Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
  • Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Mesenaatti.me or Teaming?

Of every 100 donated, Mesenaatti.me delivers approximately €84.00 to the recipient and Teaming delivers approximately £100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Mesenaatti.me is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Mesenaatti.me operates in 1 countries; Teaming operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →