givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-10 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Mesenaatti.me vs Supp.to

M
Mesenaatti.me
EEA · 1 countries

Finnish artists, associations, nonprofits, and startups running reward-based or donation crowdfunding in euro who want a domestic platform that handles Finnish fundraising-permit requirements.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Supp.to logo
Supp.to
NL · 2 countries

Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Supp.to delivers 15.51 more per 100 to the recipient than Mesenaatti.me.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Mesenaatti.me in EUR, Supp.to in GBP.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Supp.to delivers about 15.51 more of every 100 donated than Mesenaatti.me (£99.51 vs €84.00 per 100).

Mesenaatti.me stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Supp.to does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Mesenaatti.me Supp.to
Recipient gets (per 100) €84.00 £99.51★ winner
Platform fee 15% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €1.00 0% + £0.49★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 2 countries★ winner
Data residency EEA★ winner NL
Languages 1 2★ winner
Payment methods supported 1 17★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Supp.to

£99.51 vs €84.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Supp.to

2 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Mesenaatti.me

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Mesenaatti.me if

Finnish artists, associations, nonprofits, and startups running reward-based or donation crowdfunding in euro who want a domestic platform that handles Finnish fundraising-permit requirements.

  • Finland's largest home-grown crowdfunding platform, established since 2012.
  • Supports both reward-based and donation-based crowdfunding.
  • Handles the Finnish fundraising-permit requirements for donation campaigns.
  • All-or-nothing model refunds backers in full if a campaign misses its target.
Read full review →
Choose Supp.to if

Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

  • Flat per-donation fee on iDEAL and Wero (EUR 0.49) rather than a percentage cut, inclusive of 21% VAT.
  • No hidden costs and no mandatory donor tip - you pay only for successful donations.
  • Payments via Mollie Payments B.V., licensed under the Wft and supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank.
  • Keep-it-all funding model - funds are paid out even if the target is not reached.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Mesenaatti.me or Supp.to?

Of every 100 donated, Mesenaatti.me delivers approximately €84.00 to the recipient and Supp.to delivers approximately £99.51. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Mesenaatti.me is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Mesenaatti.me operates in 1 countries; Supp.to operates in 2.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →