givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-10 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Mesenaatti.me vs Steunactie

M
Mesenaatti.me
EEA · 1 countries

Finnish artists, associations, nonprofits, and startups running reward-based or donation crowdfunding in euro who want a domestic platform that handles Finnish fundraising-permit requirements.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Steunactie logo
Steunactie
— · 2 countries

Dutch- and French-speaking community fundraisers in the Netherlands and Belgium - sports clubs, schools, churches and local nonprofits - that want a simple, VAT-transparent platform with weekly payouts and no minimum goal.

The headline

Of every 100 donated, Steunactie delivers 9.40 more per 100 to the recipient than Mesenaatti.me.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Mesenaatti.me in EUR, Steunactie in GBP.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Steunactie delivers about 9.40 more of every 100 donated than Mesenaatti.me (£93.40 vs €84.00 per 100).

Mesenaatti.me stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Steunactie does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Mesenaatti.me Steunactie
Recipient gets (per 100) €84.00 £93.40★ winner
Platform fee 15% 6%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €1.00 0% + £0.00★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) 4.5 (723)★ winner
Country coverage 1 countries 2 countries★ winner
Data residency EEA★ winner
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 1 4★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Steunactie

£93.40 vs €84.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Steunactie

— vs 4.5 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Steunactie

2 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Mesenaatti.me

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Mesenaatti.me if

Finnish artists, associations, nonprofits, and startups running reward-based or donation crowdfunding in euro who want a domestic platform that handles Finnish fundraising-permit requirements.

  • Finland's largest home-grown crowdfunding platform, established since 2012.
  • Supports both reward-based and donation-based crowdfunding.
  • Handles the Finnish fundraising-permit requirements for donation campaigns.
  • All-or-nothing model refunds backers in full if a campaign misses its target.
Read full review →
Choose Steunactie if

Dutch- and French-speaking community fundraisers in the Netherlands and Belgium - sports clubs, schools, churches and local nonprofits - that want a simple, VAT-transparent platform with weekly payouts and no minimum goal.

  • Built for Benelux community causes - clubs, schools, churches and nonprofits - with simple setup.
  • Clear, VAT-inclusive pricing on a small set of common Benelux payment methods.
  • Keep-it-all funding with no minimum target, and weekly payouts that can be paused.
  • Payments handled by PSD2-licensed providers (Mollie, PayPal, Payaut).
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Mesenaatti.me or Steunactie?

Of every 100 donated, Mesenaatti.me delivers approximately €84.00 to the recipient and Steunactie delivers approximately £93.40. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Mesenaatti.me is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Mesenaatti.me operates in 1 countries; Steunactie operates in 2.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →