givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-10 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Mesenaatti.me vs mycause

M
Mesenaatti.me
EEA · 1 countries

Finnish artists, associations, nonprofits, and startups running reward-based or donation crowdfunding in euro who want a domestic platform that handles Finnish fundraising-permit requirements.

No rating yet
Read full review →
mycause logo
mycause
Australia (US backup) · 1 countries

Australian individuals, registered charities, and schools running domestic donation campaigns who value a long-established, locally owned platform with Australian data residency and a donor-tip funding model for personal causes.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, mycause delivers 13.50 more per 100 to the recipient than Mesenaatti.me.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Mesenaatti.me in EUR, mycause in AUD.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, mycause delivers about 13.50 more of every 100 donated than Mesenaatti.me (A$97.50 vs €84.00 per 100).

Mesenaatti.me stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while mycause does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Mesenaatti.me mycause
Recipient gets (per 100) €84.00 A$97.50★ winner
Platform fee 15% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €1.00 2.5% + A$0.00★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency EEA★ winner Australia (US backup)
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 1★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
mycause

A$97.50 vs €84.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Mesenaatti.me

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Mesenaatti.me if

Finnish artists, associations, nonprofits, and startups running reward-based or donation crowdfunding in euro who want a domestic platform that handles Finnish fundraising-permit requirements.

  • Finland's largest home-grown crowdfunding platform, established since 2012.
  • Supports both reward-based and donation-based crowdfunding.
  • Handles the Finnish fundraising-permit requirements for donation campaigns.
  • All-or-nothing model refunds backers in full if a campaign misses its target.
Read full review →
Choose mycause if

Australian individuals, registered charities, and schools running domestic donation campaigns who value a long-established, locally owned platform with Australian data residency and a donor-tip funding model for personal causes.

  • Long-established Australian pioneer of crowdfunding, operating since 2009.
  • Wholly Australian owned and operated, with primary servers based in Sydney.
  • Personal fundraisers carry no platform charge, funded by an optional donor tip.
  • Donations receipted to the chosen Australian charity.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Mesenaatti.me or mycause?

Of every 100 donated, Mesenaatti.me delivers approximately €84.00 to the recipient and mycause delivers approximately A$97.50. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Mesenaatti.me is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Mesenaatti.me operates in 1 countries; mycause operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →