givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-01 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

iRaiser vs Leetchi

iRaiser logo
iRaiser
EEA · 19 countries

Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Leetchi logo
Leetchi
EEA · 36 countries

French-speaking fundraisers, group collections among friends, and EU nonprofits comfortable with a longer-established platform.

The headline

On a £100 donation, iRaiser delivers £7.00 more to the recipient than Leetchi.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iRaiser delivers about £1.00 more of every £100 donated than Leetchi (£97.85 vs £96.85).

On the headline numbers, iRaiser and Leetchi are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

Fees by method · the United Kingdom

Per-method pricing vs Leetchi.

Payment method Per transaction Of £100, recipient gets Notes Leetchi · fee Leetchi gets Delta
iDEAL £0.29 flat £99.71 0% platform fee not supported
SEPA Direct Debit 0.35% + £0.25 £99.40 0% platform fee not supported
Credit card 1.9% + £0.25 £97.85 0% platform fee 2.9% + £0.25 £96.85 +£1.00
The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric iRaiser Leetchi
Recipient gets (£100) £97.85★ winner £90.85
Platform fee 0%★ winner 6%
Payment processing fee 1.9% + £0.25★ winner 2.9% + £0.25
Trustpilot — (0) 4.2 (50,786)★ winner
Country coverage 19 countries 36 countries★ winner
Data residency EEA EEA
Languages 5★ winner 4
Payment methods supported 23★ winner 3
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
iRaiser

£97.85 vs £90.85 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Leetchi

— vs 4.2 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Leetchi

36 vs 19 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose iRaiser if

Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

  • Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
  • Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
  • Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
  • Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.
Read full review →
Choose Leetchi if

French-speaking fundraisers, group collections among friends, and EU nonprofits comfortable with a longer-established platform.

  • Established European brand with strong recognition in France and Belgium
  • Free group-pot product for personal collections (gifts, group events, shared expenses)
  • EEA data residency
  • High Trustpilot rating across 50,000+ reviews
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, iRaiser or Leetchi?

On a £100 donation, iRaiser delivers approximately £97.85 to the recipient and Leetchi delivers approximately £90.85. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

iRaiser operates in 19 countries; Leetchi operates in 36.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →