givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

iHelp vs RallyUp

iHelp logo
iHelp
EU · 1 countries

Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

No rating yet
Read full review →
RallyUp logo
RallyUp
US · 0 countries

US nonprofits running game-based and event fundraising - raffles, sweepstakes, auctions and a-thons - that want multiple campaign types in one platform with no contracts and a free, donor-tip-funded option.

The headline

Of every 100 donated, iHelp delivers 3.20 more per 100 to the recipient than RallyUp.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: iHelp in EUR, RallyUp in GBP.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iHelp delivers about 3.20 more of every 100 donated than RallyUp (€100.00 vs £96.80 per 100).

iHelp stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while RallyUp does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric iHelp RallyUp
Recipient gets (per 100) €100.00★ winner £96.80
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00★ winner 2.9% + £0.30
Trustpilot — (0) 4.1 (9)★ winner
Country coverage 1 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency EU★ winner US
Languages 2★ winner 0
Payment methods supported 1 4★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
iHelp

€100.00 vs £96.80 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
RallyUp

— vs 4.1 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
iHelp

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
iHelp

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose iHelp if

Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

  • No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
  • NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
  • Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
  • Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.
Read full review →
Choose RallyUp if

US nonprofits running game-based and event fundraising - raffles, sweepstakes, auctions and a-thons - that want multiple campaign types in one platform with no contracts and a free, donor-tip-funded option.

  • More than a dozen mix-and-match campaign types, from donation pages to raffles, auctions, sweepstakes, peer-to-peer and a-thons.
  • Free plan with no platform fee, funded by optional donor tips; no contracts, setup fees or minimum fees.
  • Built-in legal compliance for raffles and sweepstakes, including prewritten rules and a review before going live.
  • Reports over 55,000 nonprofits served and more than $1 billion raised.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, iHelp or RallyUp?

Of every 100 donated, iHelp delivers approximately €100.00 to the recipient and RallyUp delivers approximately £96.80. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

iHelp is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

iHelp operates in 1 countries; RallyUp operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →