givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

iHelp vs Migranodearena

iHelp logo
iHelp
EU · 1 countries

Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Migranodearena logo
Migranodearena
— · 1 countries

Spain-based nonprofits, companies, and individual fundraisers who want a high-reach solidarity crowdfunding marketplace with transparent, openly published fees, recurring-donation support, and Bizum, and who can accept monthly payouts.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

On a €100 donation, iHelp delivers €6.45 more to the recipient than Migranodearena.

iHelp & Migranodearena don’t process payments in GBP — pricing shown in EUR.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iHelp delivers about €6.45 more of every €100 donated than Migranodearena (€100.00 vs €93.55).

iHelp stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Migranodearena does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric iHelp Migranodearena
Recipient gets (€100) €100.00★ winner €93.55
Platform fee 0%★ winner 5%
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00★ winner 1.2% + €0.25
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency EU★ winner
Languages 2 3★ winner
Payment methods supported 1 3★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
iHelp

€100.00 vs €93.55 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
iHelp

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose iHelp if

Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

  • No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
  • NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
  • Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
  • Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.
Read full review →
Choose Migranodearena if

Spain-based nonprofits, companies, and individual fundraisers who want a high-reach solidarity crowdfunding marketplace with transparent, openly published fees, recurring-donation support, and Bizum, and who can accept monthly payouts.

  • Large reach: more than 4,800 NGOs raise funds through the platform.
  • Open to all creator types, including individuals, companies, collectives, and NGOs.
  • Keep-it-all model: funds are released to the cause whether or not the goal is met.
  • Transparent, openly published commission and payment-processing fees.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, iHelp or Migranodearena?

On a €100 donation, iHelp delivers approximately €100.00 to the recipient and Migranodearena delivers approximately €93.55. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

iHelp is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

iHelp operates in 1 countries; Migranodearena operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →