givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

iHelp vs Little Phil

iHelp logo
iHelp
EU · 1 countries

Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Little Phil logo
Little Phil
Outside AU (SG/HK/US) · 1 countries

Australian donors, companies, and nonprofits focused on impact transparency and modern giving options such as crypto, workplace giving, and Shopify post-checkout donations, where offshore data storage is not a blocker.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, iHelp delivers 2.05 more per 100 to the recipient than Little Phil.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: iHelp in EUR, Little Phil in AUD.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iHelp delivers about 2.05 more of every 100 donated than Little Phil (€100.00 vs A$97.95 per 100).

iHelp stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Little Phil does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric iHelp Little Phil
Recipient gets (per 100) €100.00★ winner A$97.95
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00★ winner 1.75% + A$0.30
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency EU★ winner Outside AU (SG/HK/US)
Languages 2★ winner 1
Payment methods supported 1 4★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
iHelp

€100.00 vs A$97.95 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
iHelp

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose iHelp if

Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

  • No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
  • NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
  • Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
  • Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.
Read full review →
Choose Little Phil if

Australian donors, companies, and nonprofits focused on impact transparency and modern giving options such as crypto, workplace giving, and Shopify post-checkout donations, where offshore data storage is not a blocker.

  • Built-in impact-tracking so donors can see the effect of their giving first-hand.
  • Nonprofits pay no commission on donations, per Little Phil's nonprofits page.
  • Modern giving options: Apple Pay, Google Pay, cards, direct debit, internal credit, and cryptocurrency.
  • Spans donor, nonprofit, and corporate giving, including workplace-giving programmes.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, iHelp or Little Phil?

Of every 100 donated, iHelp delivers approximately €100.00 to the recipient and Little Phil delivers approximately A$97.95. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

iHelp is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

iHelp operates in 1 countries; Little Phil operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →