givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-10 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

iDonate.ie vs Teaming

iDonate.ie logo
iDonate.ie
EEA · 1 countries

Irish charities, clubs, schools, and community causes that want low transaction-only fees and a broad set of fundraising tools, including donation pages, crowdfunders, raffles, and events.

Teaming logo
Teaming
— · 0 countries

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

The headline

Of every 100 donated, Teaming delivers 2.20 more per 100 to the recipient than iDonate.ie.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: iDonate.ie in EUR, Teaming in GBP.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about 2.20 more of every 100 donated than iDonate.ie (£100.00 vs €97.80 per 100).

iDonate.ie holds the stronger Trustpilot record: 4.9/5 across 494 reviews, against 2.8/5 across 10 for Teaming.

iDonate.ie stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Teaming does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric iDonate.ie Teaming
Recipient gets (per 100) €97.80 £100.00★ winner
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 1.95% + €0.25 0% + £0.00★ winner
Trustpilot 4.9 (494)★ winner 2.8 (10)
Country coverage 1 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency EEA★ winner
Languages 1★ winner 0
Payment methods supported 4★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Teaming

£100.00 vs €97.80 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
iDonate.ie

4.9 vs 2.8 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
iDonate.ie

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
iDonate.ie

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose iDonate.ie if

Irish charities, clubs, schools, and community causes that want low transaction-only fees and a broad set of fundraising tools, including donation pages, crowdfunders, raffles, and events.

  • 0% platform fee with a transaction-only cost of 1.95% + EUR0.25 per donation.
  • No setup or monthly fees.
  • Donor-covers-the-fee option can reduce the net deduction for causes.
  • Broad fundraising toolkit: donation pages, crowdfunders, raffles, and event fundraising.
Read full review →
Choose Teaming if

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

  • Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
  • Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
  • Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
  • Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, iDonate.ie or Teaming?

Of every 100 donated, iDonate.ie delivers approximately €97.80 to the recipient and Teaming delivers approximately £100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

iDonate.ie is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

iDonate.ie operates in 1 countries; Teaming operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →