givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Grassrootz vs voordekunst

Grassrootz logo
Grassrootz
— · 1 countries

Australian and New Zealand registered charities running peer-to-peer campaigns and endurance-event fundraising who want supporter-driven tools and in-person cashless giving rather than personal one-off fundraisers.

No rating yet
Read full review →
voordekunst logo
voordekunst
EU · 1 countries

Dutch and Flemish artists, creative makers, and cultural institutions running concrete, project-based campaigns who value sector specialization and hands-on crowdfunding coaching.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Grassrootz delivers 8.47 more per 100 to the recipient than voordekunst.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Grassrootz in AUD, voordekunst in EUR.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Grassrootz delivers about 8.47 more of every 100 donated than voordekunst (A$100.00 vs €91.53 per 100).

voordekunst stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Grassrootz does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Grassrootz voordekunst
Recipient gets (per 100) A$100.00★ winner €91.53
Platform fee 0%★ winner 8.47%
Payment processing fee 0% + A$0.00★ winner 0% + €0.00
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency EU★ winner
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 0 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Grassrootz

A$100.00 vs €91.53 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
voordekunst

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Grassrootz if

Australian and New Zealand registered charities running peer-to-peer campaigns and endurance-event fundraising who want supporter-driven tools and in-person cashless giving rather than personal one-off fundraisers.

  • Core fundraising features provided to charity members at no cost, funded by an optional donor contribution at checkout.
  • Partnerships with major endurance events including City2Surf and the Sydney, Auckland, Brisbane, and Melbourne marathons.
  • Strong peer-to-peer tooling built around supporters' personal networks.
  • In-person cashless giving via Tap'n'Donate card readers for physical events.
Read full review →
Choose voordekunst if

Dutch and Flemish artists, creative makers, and cultural institutions running concrete, project-based campaigns who value sector specialization and hands-on crowdfunding coaching.

  • Deep specialization in arts and culture with vetted, project-based campaigns.
  • Operated by a CBF-recognized charitable foundation with funds held in trust.
  • Hands-on coaching, workshops, and editorial guidance for campaign makers.
  • Supports iDEAL, credit card, PayPal, plus Bancontact, Maestro, and Sofort.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Grassrootz or voordekunst?

Of every 100 donated, Grassrootz delivers approximately A$100.00 to the recipient and voordekunst delivers approximately €91.53. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

voordekunst is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Grassrootz operates in 1 countries; voordekunst operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →