givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

GINGER vs We Solidaire

GINGER logo
GINGER
EU · 1 countries

Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

No rating yet
Read full review →
We Solidaire logo
We Solidaire
— · 0 countries

Individuals, associations, and companies in France raising money for solidarity, health, cultural, animal, sports, religious, or memorial causes who want a simple French-language platform with broad international card acceptance.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, We Solidaire delivers 2.15 more per 100 to the recipient than GINGER.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: GINGER in EUR, We Solidaire in GBP.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, We Solidaire delivers about 2.15 more of every 100 donated than GINGER (£100.00 vs €97.85 per 100).

GINGER stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while We Solidaire does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric GINGER We Solidaire
Recipient gets (per 100) €97.85 £100.00★ winner
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 1.8% + €0.35 0% + £0.00★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency EU★ winner
Languages 1 2★ winner
Payment methods supported 4★ winner 1
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
We Solidaire

£100.00 vs €97.85 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
GINGER

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
GINGER

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose GINGER if

Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

  • One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
  • Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
  • Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
  • Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)
Read full review →
Choose We Solidaire if

Individuals, associations, and companies in France raising money for solidarity, health, cultural, animal, sports, religious, or memorial causes who want a simple French-language platform with broad international card acceptance.

  • Backed by the established Papayoux crowdfunding operator (société Déméter, Paris).
  • Payments processed by Lemonway, an institution approved by France's regulator ACPR under number 16568J.
  • Registered as an Intermédiaire en Financement Participatif (IFP) with ORIAS, number 17003690.
  • Accepts international bank cards from more than 150 countries.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GINGER or We Solidaire?

Of every 100 donated, GINGER delivers approximately €97.85 to the recipient and We Solidaire delivers approximately £100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

GINGER is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

GINGER operates in 1 countries; We Solidaire operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →