givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

GINGER vs Snowball Fundraising

GINGER logo
GINGER
EU · 1 countries

Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Snowball Fundraising logo
Snowball Fundraising
US · 1 countries

Small and mid-sized US nonprofits that want donation forms, text-to-give, online auctions and event ticketing in one platform with US-based bilingual support, fundraising domestically in US dollars.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, GINGER delivers 1.05 more per 100 to the recipient than Snowball Fundraising.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: GINGER in EUR, Snowball Fundraising in USD.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, GINGER delivers about 1.05 more of every 100 donated than Snowball Fundraising (€97.85 vs $96.80 per 100).

GINGER stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Snowball Fundraising does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric GINGER Snowball Fundraising
Recipient gets (per 100) €97.85★ winner $96.80
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 1.8% + €0.35★ winner 2.9% + $0.30
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency EU★ winner US
Languages 1★ winner 0
Payment methods supported 4★ winner 1
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
GINGER

€97.85 vs $96.80 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
GINGER

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose GINGER if

Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

  • One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
  • Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
  • Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
  • Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)
Read full review →
Choose Snowball Fundraising if

Small and mid-sized US nonprofits that want donation forms, text-to-give, online auctions and event ticketing in one platform with US-based bilingual support, fundraising domestically in US dollars.

  • All-in-one toolkit: donation forms, text-to-give and text-to-bid, online auctions, event ticketing, recurring gifts and donor CRM.
  • Free Starter tier available, with paid annual plans that remove the platform fee and speed payouts to 1-2 days.
  • Used by more than 15,000 US nonprofits, with US-based bilingual (English/Spanish) support.
  • Payments processed by Stripe; the company states no hidden platform fees beyond the chosen plan and processing.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GINGER or Snowball Fundraising?

Of every 100 donated, GINGER delivers approximately €97.85 to the recipient and Snowball Fundraising delivers approximately $96.80. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

GINGER is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

GINGER operates in 1 countries; Snowball Fundraising operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →