givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

GINGER vs Raisely

GINGER logo
GINGER
EU · 1 countries

Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Raisely logo
Raisely
AU/UK/US · 8 countries

Australian, UK and North American charities and nonprofits that want fully customizable, white-label peer-to-peer and recurring-giving campaigns, full ownership of their donor data and no lock-in contracts.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Raisely delivers 0.45 more per 100 to the recipient than GINGER.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: GINGER in EUR, Raisely in GBP.

Our verdict

What the data says.

GINGER stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Raisely does not.

On the headline numbers, GINGER and Raisely are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric GINGER Raisely
Recipient gets (per 100) €97.85 £98.30★ winner
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 1.8% + €0.35 1.4% + £0.30★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 8 countries★ winner
Data residency EU★ winner AU/UK/US
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 4★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Raisely

£98.30 vs €97.85 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Raisely

8 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
GINGER

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose GINGER if

Italian creators, associations, and local businesses running reward-based or donation campaigns who value a platform with a strong project-success rate and roots in the Emilia-Romagna region.

  • One of the highest project-success rates among Italian crowdfunding platforms
  • Mixed model supporting both reward-based campaigns and donation fundraising
  • Open to individuals, associations, businesses, and public administrations
  • Does not retain a platform percentage of funds raised (payment-processing commissions apply)
Read full review →
Choose Raisely if

Australian, UK and North American charities and nonprofits that want fully customizable, white-label peer-to-peer and recurring-giving campaigns, full ownership of their donor data and no lock-in contracts.

  • Fully customizable, white-label donation pages and campaign websites built without code.
  • Strong peer-to-peer, team-fundraising and recurring-giving tooling.
  • Donor-data ownership with CRM integrations, automation and a developer API, with no lock-in contracts.
  • Funded by optional donor tips rather than a mandatory subscription, with an optional paid plan.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GINGER or Raisely?

Of every 100 donated, GINGER delivers approximately €97.85 to the recipient and Raisely delivers approximately £98.30. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

GINGER is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

GINGER operates in 1 countries; Raisely operates in 8.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →