givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Enthuse vs WhyDonate

Enthuse logo
Enthuse
UK/EEA · 1 countries

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

WhyDonate logo
WhyDonate
EEA · 115 countries

European nonprofits and individuals who want a transparent, low-fee, GDPR-native crowdfunding platform with broad multilingual and multi-currency support.

The headline

Of every 100 donated, WhyDonate delivers 3.35 more per 100 to the recipient than Enthuse.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Enthuse in EUR, WhyDonate in GBP.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, WhyDonate delivers about 2.85 more of every 100 donated than Enthuse (£97.85 vs €95.00 per 100).

On the headline numbers, Enthuse and WhyDonate are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Enthuse WhyDonate
Recipient gets (per 100) €95.00 £98.35★ winner
Platform fee 5% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00 1.4% + £0.25★ winner
Trustpilot 4.6 (398) 4.9 (388)★ winner
Country coverage 1 countries 115 countries★ winner
Data residency UK/EEA EEA
Languages 1 19★ winner
Payment methods supported 1 24★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
WhyDonate

£98.35 vs €95.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
WhyDonate

4.6 vs 4.9 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
WhyDonate

115 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Enthuse if

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

  • White-label donation, fundraising, and event-registration pages presented under the charity's own brand.
  • Combines online donations, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event ticketing in a single platform.
  • Registered with the UK Financial Conduct Authority as a Small Payment Institution (firm reference 797344).
  • Payments processed through established providers Stripe, GoCardless, and PayPal.
Read full review →
Choose WhyDonate if

European nonprofits and individuals who want a transparent, low-fee, GDPR-native crowdfunding platform with broad multilingual and multi-currency support.

  • Zero platform fee with a transparent voluntary-tip model
  • EEA data residency and GDPR-native compliance
  • Broad coverage of local European payment rails (iDEAL, Bancontact, Klarna, Twint, Swish, MobilePay, Vipps, Blik, Cartes Bancaires, Satispay, MultiBanco, EPS) plus global rails (cards, PayPal, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Amazon Pay, Link, Revolut Pay)
  • 19-language interface and 27 supported currencies for cross-border fundraising
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Enthuse or WhyDonate?

Of every 100 donated, Enthuse delivers approximately €95.00 to the recipient and WhyDonate delivers approximately £98.35. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Enthuse operates in 1 countries; WhyDonate operates in 115.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →