givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Enthuse vs mycause

Enthuse logo
Enthuse
UK/EEA · 1 countries

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

mycause logo
mycause
Australia (US backup) · 1 countries

Australian individuals, registered charities, and schools running domestic donation campaigns who value a long-established, locally owned platform with Australian data residency and a donor-tip funding model for personal causes.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, mycause delivers 2.50 more per 100 to the recipient than Enthuse.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Enthuse in EUR, mycause in AUD.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, mycause delivers about 2.50 more of every 100 donated than Enthuse (A$97.50 vs €95.00 per 100).

Enthuse stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while mycause does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Enthuse mycause
Recipient gets (per 100) €95.00 A$97.50★ winner
Platform fee 5% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00 2.5% + A$0.00★ winner
Trustpilot 4.6 (398)★ winner — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency UK/EEA★ winner Australia (US backup)
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 1★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
mycause

A$97.50 vs €95.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Enthuse

4.6 vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Enthuse

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Enthuse if

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

  • White-label donation, fundraising, and event-registration pages presented under the charity's own brand.
  • Combines online donations, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event ticketing in a single platform.
  • Registered with the UK Financial Conduct Authority as a Small Payment Institution (firm reference 797344).
  • Payments processed through established providers Stripe, GoCardless, and PayPal.
Read full review →
Choose mycause if

Australian individuals, registered charities, and schools running domestic donation campaigns who value a long-established, locally owned platform with Australian data residency and a donor-tip funding model for personal causes.

  • Long-established Australian pioneer of crowdfunding, operating since 2009.
  • Wholly Australian owned and operated, with primary servers based in Sydney.
  • Personal fundraisers carry no platform charge, funded by an optional donor tip.
  • Donations receipted to the chosen Australian charity.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Enthuse or mycause?

Of every 100 donated, Enthuse delivers approximately €95.00 to the recipient and mycause delivers approximately A$97.50. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Enthuse is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Enthuse operates in 1 countries; mycause operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →