givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Enthuse vs Kagnotte

Enthuse logo
Enthuse
UK/EEA · 1 countries

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

Kagnotte logo
Kagnotte
— · 1 countries

French and EEA-based organisers running social group pots or association fundraising who want low, transparent per-contribution pricing and unlimited payouts at no extra cost, and who don't need an English-first international experience.

The headline

On a €100 donation, Kagnotte delivers €3.75 more to the recipient than Enthuse.

Enthuse & Kagnotte don’t process payments in GBP — pricing shown in EUR.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Kagnotte delivers about €3.75 more of every €100 donated than Enthuse (€98.75 vs €95.00).

Enthuse holds the stronger Trustpilot record: 4.6/5 across 398 reviews, against 3.9/5 across 233 for Kagnotte.

Enthuse stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Kagnotte does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Enthuse Kagnotte
Recipient gets (€100) €95.00 €98.75★ winner
Platform fee 5% 1%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00 0% + €0.00★ winner
Trustpilot 4.6 (398)★ winner 3.9 (233)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency UK/EEA★ winner
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 1 2★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Kagnotte

€98.75 vs €95.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Enthuse

4.6 vs 3.9 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Enthuse

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Enthuse if

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

  • White-label donation, fundraising, and event-registration pages presented under the charity's own brand.
  • Combines online donations, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event ticketing in a single platform.
  • Registered with the UK Financial Conduct Authority as a Small Payment Institution (firm reference 797344).
  • Payments processed through established providers Stripe, GoCardless, and PayPal.
Read full review →
Choose Kagnotte if

French and EEA-based organisers running social group pots or association fundraising who want low, transparent per-contribution pricing and unlimited payouts at no extra cost, and who don't need an English-first international experience.

  • Low headline pricing: a small per-contribution commission plus a fixed amount, undercutting many higher-rate rivals.
  • Unlimited withdrawals to a bank account at no additional charge.
  • No subscription or setup cost to create and manage a pot.
  • Regulated fund custody via Lemonway, authorised by France's ACPR (no. 16568).
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Enthuse or Kagnotte?

On a €100 donation, Enthuse delivers approximately €95.00 to the recipient and Kagnotte delivers approximately €98.75. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Enthuse is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Enthuse operates in 1 countries; Kagnotte operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →