givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Enthuse vs iDonate

Enthuse logo
Enthuse
UK/EEA · 1 countries

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

iDonate logo
iDonate
— · 0 countries

Mid-sized and larger US nonprofits that want conversion-optimised, embeddable donation and recurring-gift tools with enterprise-grade donor-data security, and are comfortable with custom, sales-quoted pricing.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, iDonate delivers 5.00 more per 100 to the recipient than Enthuse.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Enthuse in EUR, iDonate in GBP.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, iDonate delivers about 5.00 more of every 100 donated than Enthuse (£100.00 vs €95.00 per 100).

Enthuse stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while iDonate does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Enthuse iDonate
Recipient gets (per 100) €95.00 £100.00★ winner
Platform fee 5% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00 0% + £0.00★ winner
Trustpilot 4.6 (398)★ winner — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency UK/EEA★ winner
Languages 1★ winner 0
Payment methods supported 1★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
iDonate

£100.00 vs €95.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Enthuse

4.6 vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Enthuse

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Enthuse

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Enthuse if

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

  • White-label donation, fundraising, and event-registration pages presented under the charity's own brand.
  • Combines online donations, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event ticketing in a single platform.
  • Registered with the UK Financial Conduct Authority as a Small Payment Institution (firm reference 797344).
  • Payments processed through established providers Stripe, GoCardless, and PayPal.
Read full review →
Choose iDonate if

Mid-sized and larger US nonprofits that want conversion-optimised, embeddable donation and recurring-gift tools with enterprise-grade donor-data security, and are comfortable with custom, sales-quoted pricing.

  • Conversion-focused giving tools: pop-up forms, hosted donation pages, embeddable website forms, and recurring-gift prompts.
  • Enterprise donor-data security with annual SOC 2 Type 2 audits, third-party penetration testing, and a zero-trust design.
  • Operates in accordance with GDPR standards per its privacy disclosures.
  • Multiple donation rails: credit card, debit card, and ACH bank transfer.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Enthuse or iDonate?

Of every 100 donated, Enthuse delivers approximately €95.00 to the recipient and iDonate delivers approximately £100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Enthuse is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Enthuse operates in 1 countries; iDonate operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →