givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Enthuse vs Grassrootz

Enthuse logo
Enthuse
UK/EEA · 1 countries

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

Grassrootz logo
Grassrootz
— · 1 countries

Australian and New Zealand registered charities running peer-to-peer campaigns and endurance-event fundraising who want supporter-driven tools and in-person cashless giving rather than personal one-off fundraisers.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Grassrootz delivers 5.00 more per 100 to the recipient than Enthuse.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Enthuse in EUR, Grassrootz in AUD.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Grassrootz delivers about 5.00 more of every 100 donated than Enthuse (A$100.00 vs €95.00 per 100).

Enthuse stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Grassrootz does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Enthuse Grassrootz
Recipient gets (per 100) €95.00 A$100.00★ winner
Platform fee 5% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00 0% + A$0.00★ winner
Trustpilot 4.6 (398)★ winner — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency UK/EEA★ winner
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 1★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Grassrootz

A$100.00 vs €95.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Enthuse

4.6 vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Enthuse

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Enthuse if

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

  • White-label donation, fundraising, and event-registration pages presented under the charity's own brand.
  • Combines online donations, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event ticketing in a single platform.
  • Registered with the UK Financial Conduct Authority as a Small Payment Institution (firm reference 797344).
  • Payments processed through established providers Stripe, GoCardless, and PayPal.
Read full review →
Choose Grassrootz if

Australian and New Zealand registered charities running peer-to-peer campaigns and endurance-event fundraising who want supporter-driven tools and in-person cashless giving rather than personal one-off fundraisers.

  • Core fundraising features provided to charity members at no cost, funded by an optional donor contribution at checkout.
  • Partnerships with major endurance events including City2Surf and the Sydney, Auckland, Brisbane, and Melbourne marathons.
  • Strong peer-to-peer tooling built around supporters' personal networks.
  • In-person cashless giving via Tap'n'Donate card readers for physical events.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Enthuse or Grassrootz?

Of every 100 donated, Enthuse delivers approximately €95.00 to the recipient and Grassrootz delivers approximately A$100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Enthuse is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Enthuse operates in 1 countries; Grassrootz operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →