givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Enthuse vs Funraisin

Enthuse logo
Enthuse
UK/EEA · 1 countries

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

Funraisin logo
Funraisin
AU/EU/NA · 0 countries

Established nonprofits and charities running event-based, peer-to-peer, and recurring fundraising programmes that want a fully branded, white-label platform and have the capacity to operate it.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Funraisin delivers 5.00 more per 100 to the recipient than Enthuse.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Enthuse in EUR, Funraisin in GBP.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Enthuse stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Funraisin does not.

On the headline numbers, Enthuse and Funraisin are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Enthuse Funraisin
Recipient gets (per 100) €95.00 £100.00★ winner
Platform fee 5% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00 0% + £0.00★ winner
Trustpilot 4.6 (398)★ winner — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency UK/EEA★ winner AU/EU/NA
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 1 7★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Funraisin

£100.00 vs €95.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Enthuse

4.6 vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Enthuse

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Enthuse

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Enthuse if

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

  • White-label donation, fundraising, and event-registration pages presented under the charity's own brand.
  • Combines online donations, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event ticketing in a single platform.
  • Registered with the UK Financial Conduct Authority as a Small Payment Institution (firm reference 797344).
  • Payments processed through established providers Stripe, GoCardless, and PayPal.
Read full review →
Choose Funraisin if

Established nonprofits and charities running event-based, peer-to-peer, and recurring fundraising programmes that want a fully branded, white-label platform and have the capacity to operate it.

  • White-label, highly customisable platform that lets nonprofits run fully branded fundraising sites.
  • Broad feature suite: donations, peer-to-peer, events and ticketing, raffles, recurring giving, and a built-in CMS.
  • Wide payment coverage including cards, PayPal, Apple Pay and Google Pay via Stripe, iDEAL, ACH, and BECS direct debit.
  • Multilingual deployments via optional language packs and support for a wide range of currencies.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Enthuse or Funraisin?

Of every 100 donated, Enthuse delivers approximately €95.00 to the recipient and Funraisin delivers approximately £100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Enthuse is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Enthuse operates in 1 countries; Funraisin operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →