givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Enthuse vs FundRazr

Enthuse logo
Enthuse
UK/EEA · 1 countries

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

FundRazr logo
FundRazr
Canada and US · 0 countries

North American nonprofits and individual fundraisers who want a flexible, long-established platform supporting donation campaigns, peer-to-peer events, and recurring giving with a tip-based pricing option.

The headline

Of every 100 donated, FundRazr delivers 1.80 more per 100 to the recipient than Enthuse.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Enthuse in EUR, FundRazr in GBP.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, FundRazr delivers about 1.80 more of every 100 donated than Enthuse (£96.80 vs €95.00 per 100).

Enthuse holds the stronger Trustpilot record: 4.6/5 across 398 reviews, against 3.3/5 across 214 for FundRazr.

Enthuse stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while FundRazr does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Enthuse FundRazr
Recipient gets (per 100) €95.00 £96.80★ winner
Platform fee 5% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00 2.9% + £0.30★ winner
Trustpilot 4.6 (398)★ winner 3.3 (214)
Country coverage 1 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency UK/EEA★ winner Canada and US
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 1 4★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
FundRazr

£96.80 vs €95.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Enthuse

4.6 vs 3.3 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Enthuse

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Enthuse

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Enthuse if

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

  • White-label donation, fundraising, and event-registration pages presented under the charity's own brand.
  • Combines online donations, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event ticketing in a single platform.
  • Registered with the UK Financial Conduct Authority as a Small Payment Institution (firm reference 797344).
  • Payments processed through established providers Stripe, GoCardless, and PayPal.
Read full review →
Choose FundRazr if

North American nonprofits and individual fundraisers who want a flexible, long-established platform supporting donation campaigns, peer-to-peer events, and recurring giving with a tip-based pricing option.

  • Long-established platform operating since 2010 with a large campaign track record
  • Two pricing options: a donor-tip-funded plan or a platform-percentage plan
  • Supports donations, peer-to-peer events, perks, and recurring giving
  • Choice of keep-it-all or all-or-nothing campaign structures
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Enthuse or FundRazr?

Of every 100 donated, Enthuse delivers approximately €95.00 to the recipient and FundRazr delivers approximately £96.80. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Enthuse is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Enthuse operates in 1 countries; FundRazr operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →