givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

EcoCrowd vs Produzioni dal Basso

EcoCrowd logo
EcoCrowd
DE · 1 countries

German environmental and sustainability nonprofits - associations, foundations, and gGmbHs - seeking community-backed funding for SDG-aligned projects through a curated monthly donation pool.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Produzioni dal Basso logo
Produzioni dal Basso
EEA · 1 countries

Italian associations, cultural and social projects, and start-ups that want a flexible, long-established platform with multiple funding models and optional co-financing, and that do not require international reach.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Produzioni dal Basso delivers 5.30 more per 100 to the recipient than EcoCrowd.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: EcoCrowd in EUR, Produzioni dal Basso in GBP.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Produzioni dal Basso delivers about 5.30 more of every 100 donated than EcoCrowd (£95.05 vs €89.75 per 100).

Produzioni dal Basso stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while EcoCrowd does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric EcoCrowd Produzioni dal Basso
Recipient gets (per 100) €89.75 £95.05★ winner
Platform fee 8% 3%★ winner
Payment processing fee 1.9% + €0.35 1.6% + £0.35★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency DE EEA★ winner
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 3★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Produzioni dal Basso

£95.05 vs €89.75 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Produzioni dal Basso

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose EcoCrowd if

German environmental and sustainability nonprofits - associations, foundations, and gGmbHs - seeking community-backed funding for SDG-aligned projects through a curated monthly donation pool.

  • Operated by the Deutsche Umweltstiftung, an established German environmental foundation.
  • Sharp focus on sustainability and UN Sustainable Development Goal-aligned projects.
  • Distinctive monthly donation-pool model with a community vote on which project is funded.
  • Accepts PayPal and bank transfer, with donations starting from one euro.
Read full review →
Choose Produzioni dal Basso if

Italian associations, cultural and social projects, and start-ups that want a flexible, long-established platform with multiple funding models and optional co-financing, and that do not require international reach.

  • Long-established (since 2005) generalist platform with broad project eligibility.
  • Three funding modes: keep-it-all, all-or-nothing, and simple donation.
  • Run by a benefit corporation; payments via PayPal and regulated Lemonway.
  • Co-financing programs can unlock partner matching past a threshold.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, EcoCrowd or Produzioni dal Basso?

Of every 100 donated, EcoCrowd delivers approximately €89.75 to the recipient and Produzioni dal Basso delivers approximately £95.05. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Produzioni dal Basso is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

EcoCrowd operates in 1 countries; Produzioni dal Basso operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →