givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

EcoCrowd vs Little Phil

EcoCrowd logo
EcoCrowd
DE · 1 countries

German environmental and sustainability nonprofits - associations, foundations, and gGmbHs - seeking community-backed funding for SDG-aligned projects through a curated monthly donation pool.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Little Phil logo
Little Phil
Outside AU (SG/HK/US) · 1 countries

Australian donors, companies, and nonprofits focused on impact transparency and modern giving options such as crypto, workplace giving, and Shopify post-checkout donations, where offshore data storage is not a blocker.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Little Phil delivers 8.20 more per 100 to the recipient than EcoCrowd.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: EcoCrowd in EUR, Little Phil in AUD.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Little Phil delivers about 8.20 more of every 100 donated than EcoCrowd (A$97.95 vs €89.75 per 100).

On the headline numbers, EcoCrowd and Little Phil are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric EcoCrowd Little Phil
Recipient gets (per 100) €89.75 A$97.95★ winner
Platform fee 8% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 1.9% + €0.35 1.75% + A$0.30★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency DE Outside AU (SG/HK/US)
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 3 4★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Little Phil

A$97.95 vs €89.75 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose EcoCrowd if

German environmental and sustainability nonprofits - associations, foundations, and gGmbHs - seeking community-backed funding for SDG-aligned projects through a curated monthly donation pool.

  • Operated by the Deutsche Umweltstiftung, an established German environmental foundation.
  • Sharp focus on sustainability and UN Sustainable Development Goal-aligned projects.
  • Distinctive monthly donation-pool model with a community vote on which project is funded.
  • Accepts PayPal and bank transfer, with donations starting from one euro.
Read full review →
Choose Little Phil if

Australian donors, companies, and nonprofits focused on impact transparency and modern giving options such as crypto, workplace giving, and Shopify post-checkout donations, where offshore data storage is not a blocker.

  • Built-in impact-tracking so donors can see the effect of their giving first-hand.
  • Nonprofits pay no commission on donations, per Little Phil's nonprofits page.
  • Modern giving options: Apple Pay, Google Pay, cards, direct debit, internal credit, and cryptocurrency.
  • Spans donor, nonprofit, and corporate giving, including workplace-giving programmes.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, EcoCrowd or Little Phil?

Of every 100 donated, EcoCrowd delivers approximately €89.75 to the recipient and Little Phil delivers approximately A$97.95. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

EcoCrowd operates in 1 countries; Little Phil operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →