givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Doneerveilig vs Produzioni dal Basso

Doneerveilig logo
Doneerveilig
— · 0 countries

Dutch and Belgian individuals running personal fundraising campaigns who prioritise a security-focused, PSD2-compliant platform with escrow handling and a simple, quick setup.

Produzioni dal Basso logo
Produzioni dal Basso
EEA · 1 countries

Italian associations, cultural and social projects, and start-ups that want a flexible, long-established platform with multiple funding models and optional co-financing, and that do not require international reach.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Produzioni dal Basso delivers 2.71 more per 100 to the recipient than Doneerveilig.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Doneerveilig in EUR, Produzioni dal Basso in GBP.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Produzioni dal Basso delivers about 2.71 more of every 100 donated than Doneerveilig (£95.05 vs €92.34 per 100).

Produzioni dal Basso stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Doneerveilig does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Doneerveilig Produzioni dal Basso
Recipient gets (per 100) €92.34 £95.05★ winner
Platform fee 6.7% 3%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00 1.6% + £0.35★ winner
Trustpilot 2.9 (44)★ winner — (0)
Country coverage 0 countries 1 countries★ winner
Data residency EEA★ winner
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 2★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Produzioni dal Basso

£95.05 vs €92.34 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Doneerveilig

2.9 vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Produzioni dal Basso

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Produzioni dal Basso

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Doneerveilig if

Dutch and Belgian individuals running personal fundraising campaigns who prioritise a security-focused, PSD2-compliant platform with escrow handling and a simple, quick setup.

  • Security-focused framing: PSD2 compliance supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank, escrow handling, and SSL.
  • Donations held on a third-party escrow account (derdengeldenrekening) before payout.
  • Quick, simple campaign setup aimed at individual causes.
  • Account verification via a one-cent micro-transfer.
Read full review →
Choose Produzioni dal Basso if

Italian associations, cultural and social projects, and start-ups that want a flexible, long-established platform with multiple funding models and optional co-financing, and that do not require international reach.

  • Long-established (since 2005) generalist platform with broad project eligibility.
  • Three funding modes: keep-it-all, all-or-nothing, and simple donation.
  • Run by a benefit corporation; payments via PayPal and regulated Lemonway.
  • Co-financing programs can unlock partner matching past a threshold.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Doneerveilig or Produzioni dal Basso?

Of every 100 donated, Doneerveilig delivers approximately €92.34 to the recipient and Produzioni dal Basso delivers approximately £95.05. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Produzioni dal Basso is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Doneerveilig operates in 0 countries; Produzioni dal Basso operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →