givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Doneerveilig vs Enthuse

Doneerveilig logo
Doneerveilig
— · 0 countries

Dutch and Belgian individuals running personal fundraising campaigns who prioritise a security-focused, PSD2-compliant platform with escrow handling and a simple, quick setup.

Enthuse logo
Enthuse
UK/EEA · 1 countries

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

The headline

On a €100 donation, Enthuse delivers €2.66 more to the recipient than Doneerveilig.

Doneerveilig & Enthuse don’t process payments in GBP — pricing shown in EUR.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Enthuse delivers about €2.66 more of every €100 donated than Doneerveilig (€95.00 vs €92.34).

Enthuse holds the stronger Trustpilot record: 4.6/5 across 398 reviews, against 2.9/5 across 44 for Doneerveilig.

Enthuse stores donor data inside the EEA — a practical advantage for GDPR-sensitive campaigns — while Doneerveilig does not.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Doneerveilig Enthuse
Recipient gets (€100) €92.34 €95.00★ winner
Platform fee 6.7% 5%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00 0% + €0.00★ winner
Trustpilot 2.9 (44) 4.6 (398)★ winner
Country coverage 0 countries 1 countries★ winner
Data residency UK/EEA★ winner
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 2★ winner 1
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Enthuse

€95.00 vs €92.34 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Enthuse

2.9 vs 4.6 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Enthuse

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Enthuse

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Doneerveilig if

Dutch and Belgian individuals running personal fundraising campaigns who prioritise a security-focused, PSD2-compliant platform with escrow handling and a simple, quick setup.

  • Security-focused framing: PSD2 compliance supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank, escrow handling, and SSL.
  • Donations held on a third-party escrow account (derdengeldenrekening) before payout.
  • Quick, simple campaign setup aimed at individual causes.
  • Account verification via a one-cent micro-transfer.
Read full review →
Choose Enthuse if

UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

  • White-label donation, fundraising, and event-registration pages presented under the charity's own brand.
  • Combines online donations, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event ticketing in a single platform.
  • Registered with the UK Financial Conduct Authority as a Small Payment Institution (firm reference 797344).
  • Payments processed through established providers Stripe, GoCardless, and PayPal.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Doneerveilig or Enthuse?

On a €100 donation, Doneerveilig delivers approximately €92.34 to the recipient and Enthuse delivers approximately €95.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Enthuse is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Doneerveilig operates in 0 countries; Enthuse operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →