givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-03 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Doare vs Les Petites Pierres

Doare logo
Doare
— · 1 countries

Brazilian nonprofits and third-sector organizations that want hosted donation pages, recurring-giving tools, and a donor CRM to build a sustained local donor base, rather than a one-off campaign.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Les Petites Pierres logo
Les Petites Pierres
FR · 1 countries

French associations and nonprofits running solidarity-housing and anti-poverty projects, who benefit from partner matching that doubles eligible donations and from French tax-deductible giving.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Les Petites Pierres delivers 6.25 more per 100 to the recipient than Doare.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Doare in GBP, Les Petites Pierres in EUR.

Our verdict

What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Les Petites Pierres delivers about 6.25 more of every 100 donated than Doare (€100.00 vs £93.75 per 100).

On the headline numbers, Doare and Les Petites Pierres are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Doare Les Petites Pierres
Recipient gets (per 100) £93.75 €100.00★ winner
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 5.8% + £0.45 0% + €0.00★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency FR
Languages 3★ winner 1
Payment methods supported 8★ winner 4
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Les Petites Pierres

€100.00 vs £93.75 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Doare if

Brazilian nonprofits and third-sector organizations that want hosted donation pages, recurring-giving tools, and a donor CRM to build a sustained local donor base, rather than a one-off campaign.

  • Purpose-built nonprofit toolkit: donation pages, recurring giving, and donor CRM.
  • Supports Brazilian rails including boleto and PIX, plus automatic recurring PIX.
  • Tiered plans with per-transaction costs that decrease at higher tiers.
  • Peer-to-peer ambassador fundraising and corporate ESG and matching products.
Read full review →
Choose Les Petites Pierres if

French associations and nonprofits running solidarity-housing and anti-poverty projects, who benefit from partner matching that doubles eligible donations and from French tax-deductible giving.

  • Partner matching doubles every eligible donation up to the project goal.
  • Run as an endowment fund, so associations collect without a platform commission.
  • Banking commissions reimbursed by partner Crédit Agricole des Savoie.
  • French tax-receipt handling and donor tax deductions supported.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Doare or Les Petites Pierres?

Of every 100 donated, Doare delivers approximately £93.75 to the recipient and Les Petites Pierres delivers approximately €100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Doare operates in 1 countries; Les Petites Pierres operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →